Re: Version linking?

From: Christoph Päper via Unicode <unicode_at_unicode.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 23:34:39 +0200 (CEST)

Mark Davis ☕️:
>
> E5.0 did have the emoji properties of some 10.0 characters a bit ahead of
> time, but only after they were completely locked down.

This should be absolutely avoided in the future, because it was effectively the other way around: No changes to the beta characters were possible because they were already in UTS#51.
Received on Thu Aug 17 2017 - 16:34:55 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Philippe Verdy via Unicode: "Re: Should U+3248 ... U+324F be wide characters?"
Previous message: Richard Wordingham via Unicode: "Re: Version linking?"
In reply to: Mark Davis ☕️ via Unicode: "Re: Version linking?"
Next in thread: Richard Wordingham via Unicode: "Re: Version linking?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Aug 17 2017 - 16:34:55 CDT