Re: A last missing link for interoperable representation

From: Richard Wordingham via Unicode <unicode_at_unicode.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 01:14:45 +0000

On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 23:43:46 +0000
James Kass via Unicode <unicode_at_unicode.org> wrote:

> The second step would be to persuade Unicode to encode a new
> character rather than simply using an existing variation selector
> character to do the job.

Actually, this might be a superior option.

Richard.
Received on Thu Jan 10 2019 - 19:15:09 CST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: James Kass via Unicode: "Re: A last missing link for interoperable representation"
Previous message: James Kass via Unicode: "Re: A last missing link for interoperable representation"
In reply to: James Kass via Unicode: "Re: A last missing link for interoperable representation"
Next in thread: James Kass via Unicode: "Re: A last missing link for interoperable representation"
Reply: James Kass via Unicode: "Re: A last missing link for interoperable representation"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Jan 10 2019 - 19:15:09 CST