On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 16:02:05 -0800
Asmus Freytag via Unicode <unicode_at_unicode.org> wrote:
> On 1/14/2019 3:37 PM, Richard Wordingham via Unicode wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jan 2019 00:02:49 +0100
> Hans Åberg via Unicode <unicode_at_unicode.org> wrote:
>
> On 14 Jan 2019, at 23:43, James Kass via Unicode
> <unicode_at_unicode.org> wrote:
>
> Hans Åberg wrote,
>
> How about using U+0301 COMBINING ACUTE ACCENT: 𝑝𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑒́
>
> Thought about using a combining accent. Figured it would just
> display with a dotted circle but neglected to try it out first. It
> actually renders perfectly here. /That's/ good to know. (smile)
>
> It is a bit off here. One can try math, too: the derivative of 𝛾(𝑡)
> is 𝛾̇(𝑡).
>
> No it isn't. You should be using a spacing character for
> differentiation.
>
> Sorry, but there may be different conventions. The dot / double-dot
> above is definitely common usage in physics.
>
> A./
Apologies. It was positioned in the parenthesis, and it looked like a
misplaced U+0301.
Richard.
Received on Mon Jan 14 2019 - 19:18:41 CST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jan 14 2019 - 19:18:41 CST