RE: Unicode "no-op" Character?

This message: [ Message body ] [ Respond ] [ More options ]
Related messages: [ Next message ] [ Previous message ] [ In reply to ] [ Next in thread ]

From: Sławomir Osipiuk via Unicode <unicode_at_unicode.org>
Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2019 20:30:37 -0400

Ah, sorry. I meant to say that the string should always be normalized (not "sanitized") before being checked for exploits (i.e. sanitized).

-----Original Message-----
From: Sławomir Osipiuk [mailto:sosipiuk_at_gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, June 23, 2019 20:28
To: unicode_at_unicode.org
Cc: 'Richard Wordingham'
Subject: RE: Unicode "no-op" Character?

The string should always be sanitized before being checked for exploits
Received on Sun Jun 23 2019 - 19:30:55 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jun 23 2019 - 19:30:55 CDT