On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 5:35 PM David Starner via Unicode <
unicode_at_unicode.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 23, 2019 at 10:41 PM Shawn Steele via Unicode
> <unicode_at_unicode.org> wrote:
>
> IMO, since it's unlikely that anyone expects
> that they can transmit a NUL through an arbitrary channel, unlike a
> random private use character.
You would be wrong.
NUL is a valid codepoint like any other; except like in the C standard
library and descendants.
And, I expect it to be maintained. And, for the most part is, (except for
emscripten)
>
> --
> Kie ekzistas vivo, ekzistas espero.
>
Received on Mon Jun 24 2019 - 22:46:44 CDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jun 24 2019 - 22:46:44 CDT