Dataset for all ISO639 code sorted by country/territory?
verdy_p at wanadoo.fr
Sun Nov 20 15:53:54 CST 2016
I think it just requires a minimal dataset: ask for it, submit the data, it
will be made available for vetting, and if vetting makes it suitable for
publication with the minimal core set of properties, it will be added to
the published list. But you need paritcipants and need to convince some
CLDR members to support this addition and dedicated some competent
resources to validate the surveys (otherwise a supporting "academy" can
also join the CLDR TC to get more votes than a single vote for all
non-members (which would not be anough for publication, or would only be
published separately with a "draft" status, waiting for more supporters.
2016-11-20 22:02 GMT+01:00 Mats Blakstad <mats.gbproject at gmail.com>:
> On 20 November 2016 at 21:11, Shawn Steele <Shawn.Steele at microsoft.com>
>> > I understand it would take a lot of time to collect the full data, but
>> it also depends on how much engagement you manage to create for the work.
>> Given the CLDR track record, where all languages do not even have locale
> Why do not every language have a local in CLDR? And should they not have?
> Are the locals used not just those same used in the IANA subtag register?
> What are the criteria for a language to be included in CLDR?
> CLDR-Users mailing list
> CLDR-Users at unicode.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the CLDR-Users