richard.wordingham at ntlworld.com
Tue Jun 3 13:59:23 CDT 2014
On Tue, 03 Jun 2014 16:09:27 +0900
"Martin J. Dürst" <duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp> wrote:
> I'd strongly suggest that completely independent of when and how
> Corrigendum #9 gets tweaked or fixed, a quick and firm plan gets
> worked out for how to get rid of these codepoints in CLDR data. The
> sooner, the better.
I suspect this has already been done. I know of no CLDR text files
still containing them.
More information about the Unicode