Corrigendum #9

Richard Wordingham richard.wordingham at
Tue Jun 3 13:59:23 CDT 2014

On Tue, 03 Jun 2014 16:09:27 +0900
"Martin J. Dürst" <duerst at> wrote:

> I'd strongly suggest that completely independent of when and how 
> Corrigendum #9 gets tweaked or fixed, a quick and firm plan gets
> worked out for how to get rid of these codepoints in CLDR data. The
> sooner, the better.

I suspect this has already been done.  I know of no CLDR text files
still containing them.


More information about the Unicode mailing list