sex and emoji
ian.clifton at chem.ox.ac.uk
Mon Feb 16 05:48:07 CST 2015
Tim Partridge <timpart at perdix.demon.co.uk> writes:
> Antoine Méric said
>> I was wondering, has the question « Given the massive usage over
>> of the glyph, and the number of academic papers about it, should we
>>adding a PHALLIC REPRESENTATION to the unicode standard ? » ever been
> asked ?
> The Ancient Egyptians had some glyphs to act as determinatives for
> words that relate to that topic, and they are encoded in the standard.
> See U+130B8 to A.
Good grief, I don’t like the look of U+130B9. Maybe I don’t want to know
what’s going on .
More information about the Unicode