richard.wordingham at ntlworld.com
Thu Jul 9 13:25:05 CDT 2015
On Thu, 09 Jul 2015 08:58:08 -0700
"Doug Ewell" <doug at ewellic.org> wrote:
> I suppose the response to this proposal won't be made public.
It's a shame there's no precedent for proposals being rejected for
lying. However, it might be rejected for being a 'contemporary'
script with no users - that much is admitted to!
More information about the Unicode