BidiMirrored property and ancient scripts (Was Re: Plain text custom fraction input)
richard.wordingham at ntlworld.com
Sat Jul 25 02:44:22 CDT 2015
On Sat, 25 Jul 2015 10:14:58 +0300
Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu.org> wrote:
> From: Richard Wordingham <richard.wordingham at ntlworld.com>
> > Asmus Freytag <asmusf at ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > > We do want "BidiMirrorred=No" to be honored; for example for the
> > > arrows and the ornate parens. And we do not want that to be
> > > overridden
> > And at present, that may be overridden in a right-to-left context!
> What do you mean by "overridden" in this context? AFAIK, mirroring
> indeed depends on context, but a character whose BidiMirrorred
> property is No will _never_ be mirrored, according to the UBA. There
> are no overrides for that property, AFAIK.
Reread the Bidi algorithm, especially
In principle, I could have a higher-level protocol that mirrors lamedh
on Wednesdays, but I must follow the rules for parentheses.
It's part of the tendency to write specifications as 'Do what you want,
but we recommend...'. It eliminates non-compliances without increasing
More information about the Unicode