Emoji characters for food allergens
gwalla at gmail.com
Tue Jul 28 17:27:08 CDT 2015
That's what Mr. Overington wants, but he's not the original proposer.
The proposal by Hiroyuki Komatsu
not say anything of the sort, and by unifying some with existing
characters implies otherwise.
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 1:26 PM, gfb hjjhjh <c933103 at gmail.com> wrote:
> As according to http://unicode.org/faq/emoji_dingbats.html , emoji
> characters do not have single semantics. Which I think it is not what the
> original proposer want? Or were I misunderstanding that
> 2015年7月29日 上午3:28於 "Doug Ewell" <doug at ewellic.org>寫道：
>> gfb hjjhjh <c933103 at gmail dot com> wrote:
>> > Probably if these symbols are to be added to unicode, it would better
>> > to allocate blocks that are not belong to emoji for them.
>> I'm curious what this is supposed to accomplish. It's not as though
>> people viewing such a symbol on a screen or in print, or entering it on
>> a phone keypad, will know or care what its Unicode code point is, or
>> what other types of symbols have nearby code points.
>> The Miscellaneous Symbols block contains U+2620 SKULL AND CROSSBONES,
>> U+2623 BIOHAZARD SIGN, and U+263A WHITE SMILING FACE.
>> Doug Ewell | http://ewellic.org | Thornton, CO
More information about the Unicode