richard.wordingham at ntlworld.com
Wed May 20 20:08:06 CDT 2015
On Wed, 20 May 2015 17:15:28 -0700
"Asmus Freytag (t)" <asmus-inc at ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> Have there been any discussions of the flag alphabet? (Signal flags).
> It seems to me that when schemes for representing sets of flags are
> discussed, it would be useful to keep open the ability to use the
> same scheme for signal flags -- perhaps with a different base
> character to avoid collisions in the letter codes.
If these are worthy of coding, I think the Unified Canadian Aboriginal
Syllabics would be a better model - encode the form, not the semantic.
Braille is another precedent.
More information about the Unicode