petercon at microsoft.com
Wed May 27 11:10:46 CDT 2015
Well, the same reasoning could also argue for the contra-positive (a→b ⊨ ¬b→¬a): that UTC should not consider endorsing such a tag scheme.
From: William_J_G Overington [mailto:wjgo_10009 at btinternet.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2015 12:54 AM
To: unicode at unicode.org; Peter Constable; eric.muller at efele.net; asmus-inc at ix.netcom.com
Subject: Re: Tag characters
Peter Constable wrote as follows:
> Would Unicode really want to get into the business of running a UFL service?
Well, Unicode is about precision, interoperability and long-term stability, and, given, in relation to one particular specified base character followed by some tag characters, that a particular sequence of Unicode characters is intended to lead to the display of an image representing a particular flag, it seems to me highly reasonable that the Unicode Technical Committee might seriously consider providing that facility.
27 May 2015
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Unicode