Question about Perl5 extended UTF-8 design
richard.wordingham at ntlworld.com
Fri Nov 6 14:32:20 CST 2015
On Thu, 05 Nov 2015 13:41:42 -0700
"Doug Ewell" <doug at ewellic.org> wrote:
> Richard Wordingham wrote:
> > No-one's claiming it is for a Unicode Transformation Format (UTF).
> Then they ought not to call it "UTF-8" or "extended" or "modified"
> UTF-8, or anything of the sort, even if the bit-shifting algorithm is
> based on UTF-8.
> "UTF-8 encoding form" is defined as a mapping of Unicode scalar values
> -- not arbitrary integers -- onto byte sequences. [D92]
If it extends the mapping of Unicode scalar values *into* byte
sequences, then it's an extension. A non-trivial extension of a
mapping of scalar values has to have a larger domain.
I'm assuming that 'UTF-8' and 'UTF' are not registered trademarks.
More information about the Unicode