Concise term for non-ASCII Unicode characters
doug at ewellic.org
Mon Sep 21 10:42:38 CDT 2015
Sean Leonard wrote:
> Additionally as Peter stated, an expression including "Basic Latin
> block" (e.g., characters beyond the Basic Latin block) could work.
I was thinking that something like "non–Basic-Latin Unicode" might be
useful. It avoids the confusion of referring to ASCII as a range of code
points instead of a separate encoding standard.
Doug Ewell | http://ewellic.org | Thornton, CO
More information about the Unicode