Concise term for non-ASCII Unicode characters
Martin J. Dürst
duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp
Mon Sep 21 18:59:51 CDT 2015
On 2015/09/22 00:42, Doug Ewell wrote:
> I was thinking that something like "non–Basic-Latin Unicode" might be
Is that non-Basic Latin or not Basic-Latin?
> useful. It avoids the confusion of referring to ASCII as a range of code
> points instead of a separate encoding standard.
But as a three-component term with unclear structure, it's confusing by
More information about the Unicode