Invisible letter (was Re: a character for an unknown character)
corbett.dav at husky.neu.edu
Wed Dec 21 10:56:27 CST 2016
Couldn’t you use U+1D52 MODIFIER LETTER SMALL O?
(I changed the subject line because the invisible letter proposal is not
relevant to the question about a lacuna character.)
> I strongly support this. In our historical corpus of Polish
> we have in particular words ending with 'COMBINING LATIN SMALL LETTER
> O' (U+0366).
> We had to precede the character with NBSP as the vase, but to preserve
> the correct segmentation into words we had to treat NBSP as a letter.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Unicode