Noto unified font
oren.watson at gmail.com
Sun Oct 9 07:14:50 CDT 2016
I am disappointed with Noto Mono, which only covers Latin script, and not
Greek, and Cyrillic when most existing monospace fonts do.
On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 7:28 AM, Philippe Verdy <verdy_p at wanadoo.fr> wrote:
> 2016-10-09 8:17 GMT+02:00 Luke Dashjr <luke at dashjr.org>:
>> On Sunday, October 09, 2016 4:37:24 AM Philippe Verdy wrote:
>> > The licence itself says it respects the 4 FSF freedoms. It also
>> > allows reselling (rule DFSG #1):
>> > http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/page.php?site_id=nrsi&id=OFL
>> No, it doesn't. That link is just a commentary, and of no relevance to
>> SIL-owned fonts.
> The link is the one directly used on the Noto description page when it
> refers to the OFL licence. It is not saying that it is only for SIL-owned
> fonts. Google/Monotype would have linked to another page if needed but this
> is the most relevant one explicitly stated by Google on the Noto site.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Unicode