Standaridized variation sequences for the Desert alphabet?
Mark Davis ☕️
mark at macchiato.com
Thu Apr 6 10:05:37 CDT 2017
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Michael Everson <everson at evertype.com>
> I just get frustrated when everyone including the veterans seems to forget
> every bit of precedent that we have for the useful encoding of characters.
Nobody's forgetting anything. Simply because people disagree with you
doesn't mean they are forgetful or stupid. One could just as well respond
that you are forgetting that Unicode is *not* a glyph standard. Merely
because a character have multiple shapes is not grounds for disunifying it.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Unicode