Standaridized variation sequences for the Desert alphabet?
everson at evertype.com
Sun Mar 26 11:20:42 CDT 2017
> On 26 Mar 2017, at 16:59, Asmus Freytag <asmusf at ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> On 3/26/2017 8:47 AM, Michael Everson wrote:
>>> On 26 Mar 2017, at 16:45, Asmus Freytag <asmusf at ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>> The latter is patent nonsense, because ä and aͤ are even less related to each other than "i" and "j"; never mind the fact that their forms are both based on the letter "a". Encoding and font choice should be seen as separate.
>> He refers to the shape of the diacritical marks.
> I see the issue: the font selected on my end made the "e" look like an "o", which completely changed my understanding of what he tried to communicate.
More information about the Unicode