Feedback on the proposal to change U+FFFD generation when decoding ill-formed UTF-8
Doug Ewell via Unicode
unicode at unicode.org
Tue May 23 15:42:58 CDT 2017
Asmus Freytag \(c\) wrote:
> And why add a recommendation that changes that from completely up to
> the implementation (or groups of implementations) to something where
> one way of doing it now has to justify itself?
A recommendation already exists, at the end of Section 3.9. The current
proposal is to change it to recommend something else.
Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, US | ewellic.org
More information about the Unicode