Peter Edberg via Unicode
unicode at unicode.org
Sat Oct 28 18:20:08 CDT 2017
This is about characters U+1F327,U+1F326
The variation selector FE0F is *not* unnecessary in with these. Looking at
those characters do *not* have the Emoji-Presentation property set, and they do have variation sequences defined.
From https://www.unicode.org/reports/tr51/#Emoji_Variation_Selector_Notes <https://www.unicode.org/reports/tr51/#Emoji_Variation_Selector_Notes>, such singleton emoji characters
“should have emoji presentation selectors on base characters with Emoji_Presentation=No whenever an emoji presentation is desired”
- Peter E
> On Oct 28, 2017, at 4:11 AM, Andre Schappo via Unicode <unicode at unicode.org> wrote:
> I am working on a Blog Article ( https://schappo.blogspot.co.uk/2017/10/computer-science-internationalization.html <https://schappo.blogspot.co.uk/2017/10/computer-science-internationalization.html> ) and do not currently have access to OSX High Sierra, I am using OSX Sierra. I would appreciate some help from someone using OSX High Sierra.
> Using Sierra's Chinese Simplified Input Method the Emoji ️ and ️ have an unnecessary U+FE0F variation selector appended. The other Emoji I have tested with Sierra's Chinese Simplified Input Method do not have the variation selector appended. Could someone please check if the same happens with High Sierra
> Thank you
> André Schappo
> https://schappo.blogspot.co.uk <https://schappo.blogspot.co.uk/>
> https://twitter.com/andreschappo <https://twitter.com/andreschappo>
> https://weibo.com/andreschappo <https://weibo.com/andreschappo>
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/computer-science-curriculum-internationalization <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/computer-science-curriculum-internationalization>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Unicode