This page is a compilation of formal public feedback received so far. See Feedback for further information on this issue, how to discuss it, and how to provide feedback.
Date/Time: Sat Jan 14 13:53:21 CST 2017
Name: Charlotte Buff
Report Type: Public Review Issue
Opt Subject: PRI #344: Potential error in mapping of U+31D2
In the current draft U+31D2 ㇒ CJK STROKE P is mapped to U+4E3F 丿 CJK UNIFIED IDEOGRAPH-4E3F. However, in the code charts U+4E3F looks much closer to U+31D3 ㇓ CJK STROKE SP, which has no equivalent ideograph defined.
Ken Lunde sent the following response on 2017/01/19:
Charlotte, Thank you for making the effort for checking PRI #344 and submitting the following feedback: > > In the current draft U+31D2 ㇒ CJK STROKE P is mapped to U+4E3F 丿 CJK UNIFIED IDEOGRAPH-4E3F. > > However, in the code charts U+4E3F looks much closer to U+31D3 ㇓ CJK STROKE SP, which has no > > equivalent ideograph defined. I agree with you that the best mapping for U+31D3 is U+4E3F, and I think that the best solution is to map both characters, U+31D2 and U+31D3, to U+4E3F. I also think that U+31CF can map to U+4E40 (like U+31DD), U+31DB can map to U+21FE8, and U+31DC can map to U+200CB. Regards... -- Ken
Feedback above this line was considered during UTC #150.