|
DOC TYPE: | Summary of Voting/Table of Replies
|
TITLE:
|
Summary of Voting on SC 2 N 3186, Combined PDAM registration and consideration ballot on WD for 10646-1/Amd. 28, Information technology - Universal Multiple-Octet Coded Character Set (UCS) - Part 1: Architecture and Basic Multilingual Plane -- AMENDMENT 28: Ideographic description characters |
SOURCE:
|
Secretariat, ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 2 |
PROJECT:
|
JTC 1.02.18.01.28 |
STATUS:
|
1) PDAM Registration: Approved. 2) PDAM Consideration: This document is forwarded to WG 2 for consideration. WG 2 is requested to prepare a disposition of comments report, revised text and a recommendation to the SC 2 Secretariat for further processing. |
ACTION ID: | ACT |
DUE DATE: | |
DISTRIBUTION: | P, O and L Members of ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 2
WG Conveners, Secretariats ISO/IEC JTC 1 Secretariat ISO/IEC ITTF |
NO. OF PAGES: | 5 |
ACCESS LEVEL: | Defined |
WEB ISSUE #: | 042 |
PDAM Registration | PDAM Consideration | |||||||||
P-member | Approve | Approve with Comments | Disapprove | Abstain | Approve | Approve with Comments | Disapprove | Abstain | Comment | |
Armenia* | ||||||||||
Australia |
|
|
||||||||
Austria | ||||||||||
Belgium | ||||||||||
Brazil | ||||||||||
Canada |
|
|
Att 1 | |||||||
China |
|
|
||||||||
Denmark |
|
|
||||||||
Egypt |
|
|
||||||||
Ethiopia | ||||||||||
Finland |
|
|
||||||||
France | ||||||||||
Germany |
|
|
||||||||
Greece |
|
|
||||||||
Iceland | ||||||||||
India | ||||||||||
Iran, Islamic Republic of | ||||||||||
Ireland |
|
|
Att.2 | |||||||
Israel |
|
|
||||||||
Italy | ||||||||||
Japan |
|
|
||||||||
Korea Rep. Of | ||||||||||
Morocco | ||||||||||
Netherlands |
|
|
||||||||
Norway |
|
|
||||||||
Poland |
|
|
||||||||
Romania | ||||||||||
Singapore |
|
|
||||||||
Slovenia | ||||||||||
Sweden |
|
|
Att.3 | |||||||
Thailand | ||||||||||
Tunisia | ||||||||||
Turkey | ||||||||||
UK |
|
|
Att.4 | |||||||
USA |
|
|
Att.5 | |||||||
Viet Nam | ||||||||||
Yugoslavia | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
O-Member | ||||||||||
Portugue |
|
|
||||||||
Russian Federation |
|
|
SIGNIFICANT:
1. This set of descriptors may lead to indeterminate results. To illustrate
this point, the overlaying of "radical two" and "radical line",
2FFB U+4E28 U+4E8C,
can be U+5E72, U+5DE5 or U+571F.
They have *different* *abstract forms*. This indeterminacy should
be eliminated through either rules or introduction of more descriptors.
2. It is not clear if these characters (and construction rules) were taken from relevant national standards, de facto industry standard, or scholarly literature. The source of these characters should be identified, or their novelty noted. An information annex should be considered along with these characters if the construction rules and descriptors are based on (sound but untested) theories.
The Canadian vote will be APPROVE if the above two concerns are addressed satisfactorily.
Editorial:
In addition, nesting of IDS is allowed (and indeed necessary for this descriptor set to be complete). This property is only implicitly acknowledged through a point item (last item in first paragraph of D.3.1). It is desirable that an example of nested IDSs is given explicitly.
UK COMMENTS ACCOMPANYING VOTE OF APPROVAL ON ISO/IEC 10646-1-PDAM 28: Ideographic Description Characters (SC2 N 3186)
Editorial comments:
Page 3. In the character names, replace the sequence IDEOGRAPHIC DESCRIPTION CHARACTER by IDEOGRAPHIC DESCRIPTOR (and make similar adjustments to the names on other pages).
Justification:
a. The term CHARACTER does not add any useful information to the character name.
b. Annex D already includes several characters whose names
have a final term such as FILLER, JOINER, or SEPARATOR. The term DESCRIPTOR
is quite appropriate in that context.
Page 4. The twelve examples given in the text of D3.2 should be removed
into a set of three extra columns in Table D.1 (page 6).
Page 5. In the entry for Annex E the hex code position numbers should
be inserted in front of the character names, and the names should be alphabetically
ordered.
U.S. Comments supporting the Approval vote for the Consideration Ballot on SC 2 N 3186, WD 10646-1/Amd. 28
Comments:
Text on page 4, D.3.1 : The reference to "a coded ideographic component"
in D.3.1 must be removed since this concept does not exist in ISO 10646.