Proposal to add 10 Cyrillic S�mi characters to ISO 10646

ISO/IEC JTC1/SC2/WG2 N______
Date: 1997-06-09
This is an unofficial HTML version of a document submitted to WG2.

Title: Proposal to add 10 Cyrillic S�mi characters to ISO/IEC 10646

Source: Trond Trosterud, Barentssekratariat (NO)
Status: NTS, Norwegian Member Body Contribution
Action: For consideration by JTC1/SC2/WG2

This document contains the proposal summary (ISO/IEC JTC1/SC2/WG2 form N1352) and a full proposal for the encoding of 10 Cyrillic characters in ISO/IEC 10646.

A. Administrative

1. Title	10 Cyrillic characters for Kildin S�mi
2. Requester's name	Trond Trosterud
3. Requester type	Member body contribution
4. Submission date	1997-06-09
5. Requester's reference	http://www.indigo.ie/egt/standards/se/kild.html, ISO-IR 200
6a. Completion	This is a complete proposal.
6b. More information to be provided?	No

B. Technical -- General

1a. New script? Name?	No
1b. Addition of characters to existing block? Name?	Yes, Cyrillic
2. Number of characters	10
3. Proposed category	Category A
4. Proposed level of implementation and rationale	Level 1; see Appendix A
5a. Character names included in proposal?	Yes
5b. Character names in accordance with guidelines?	Yes
5c. Character shapes reviewable?	Yes (see Appendix A)
6a. Who will provide computerized font?	Michael Everson, Everson Gunn Teoranta
6b. Font currently available?	Michael Everson, Everson Gunn Teoranta
6c. Font format?	TrueType
7a. Are references (to other character sets, dictionaries, descriptive texts, etc.) provided?	Yes (see Appendix A)
7b. Are published examples (such as samples from newspapers, magazines, or other sources) of use of proposed characters attached?	Yes (see Appendix B)
8. Does the proposal address other aspects of character data processing?	No

C. Technical -- Justification

1. Has this proposal been submitted before? Explain	No
2. Contact with the user community?	Yes, with Saamskij sektor, Akademia NAUK, Murmansk
3. Information on the user community?	Limited (see Appendix A)
4a. The context of use for the proposed characters?	Common
4b. Reference	Appendix A
5a. Proposed characters in current use?	Yes
5b. Where?	In the Kola peninsula.
6a. Characters should be encoded entirely in BMP?	Yes
6b. Rationale	All Cyrillic characters should be in the BMP
7. Should characters be kept in a continuous range?	No, but they should be kept together with the other Cyrillic characters.
8a. Can the characters be considered a presentation form of an existing character or character sequence?	Yes, for 2 of the 10 characters
8b. Where?	�
8c. Reference	See Appendix A
9a. Can any of the characters be considered to be similar (in appearance or function) to an existing character?	No
9b. Where?	�
9c. Reference	�
10a. Combining characters or use of composite sequences included?	No
10b. List of composite sequences and their corresponding glyph images provided?	No
11. Characters with any special properties such as control function, etc. included?	No

D. SC2/WG2 Administrative

To be completed by SC2/WG2

1. Relevant SC 2/WG 2 document numbers: �

2. Status (list of meeting number and corresponding action or disposition) �

3. Additional contact to user communities, liaison organizations etc. �

4. Assigned category and assigned priority/time frame �

Other Comments �

E. Proposal

Inclusion of 10 character positions for Kildin S�mi in ISO/IEC 10646

Trond Trosterud, Committee for Character Set Technology, Norsk Teknologistandardisering

Historical background for the Kildin S�mi script

The development of literary Kildin S�mi follows the path of the other non-Slavic languages quite closely. It was written for the first time in the second half of the last century, in form of religious texts based on the Cyrillic alphabet. In the late twenties and early thirties the Institute of the Northern Peoples initiated work that resulted in a Latin-based orthography, developed by Z. Chernjakov, accepted by Narkompros RSFSR in May, 1931. This orthography was in use until 1937, when it was replaced by a Cyrillic orthography, developed by A. G. Endjukovskij. Until this point, the development of the S�mi orthography has followed a path similar to all other non-Slavic languages of the Soviet Union. After WWII, almost all these languages carried on using their newly developed Cyrillic orthographies, with the exception of the deported nationalities (Crimean Tartars, etc.) , and of the nationalities with close relative in Finland (Karelians, Vepsians and S�mis).

As for the S�mis, work was initiated in the early 70s to reintroduce the S�mi language in schools, according to school authorities because it was observed that the S�mi children did not master the Russian language properly. It was quickly realized that, contrary to the 1931 orthography, the 1937 Cyrillic orthography did not match the phonemic structure of the Kildin S�mi language, and a new orthography was made, and formally accepted in 1982.

Cyrillic characters in ISO/IEC 10646

Almost all Cyrillic characters of the former Soviet Union are included in 10646. The ones missing are exactly the ones that were not in use in the decades following WWII. Thus, these characters probably were missing from the sources that were used in the preparatory work for the Cyrillic part of 10646 in the first place.

The structure of the characters

CYRILLIC LETTERS SHORT I, EL, EM, WITH DESCENDER, and CYRILLIC LETTER ER WITH TICK

10646 already contains characters with descenders, one of them (CYRILLIC EN WITH DESCENDER) is in use in Kildin S�mi. The descenders cannot be composed, thus they must be included in 10646 as is. The same goes for the CYRILLIC LETTER R WITH TICK. The tick is attached to the basic symbol, its form is unique (there are no other letters composed by that exact diacritic mark), thus no diacritic mark will be able to match the tick of the ER.

CYRILLIC LETTER E WITH DIAERESIS

All WITH DIAERESIS characters can be composed, but in this case it would create a undesirable asymmetry, since all the other Cyrillic (and Latin) characters with diaeresis already have unique non composed positions. If CYRILLIC LETTER E WITH DIAERESIS should be treated as a composed character, the result for Kildin S�mi would be that one of its diaeresis letters would be created directly, the other via composition, a clearly undesirable state of affairs. Of the cyrillic letters denoting vowels, only CYRILLIC LETTER E has no variety with diaeresis 1). As the situation is today, this is a hole in the structure of the Cyrillic subset of 10646.

User community

According to the 1989 Soviet census, (Vestnik Statistiki 1/1989) there are 1888 Kildin S�mi, of which 1.001 has S�mi as their mother tongue.. Kildin S�mi is spoken on the Kola peninsula, in Murmansk Oblast' of North Western Russia.

S�mi is a school subject in primary schools, and articles are occasionally published in S�mi in the local newspaper Lovozerskaja Pravda. As a result of the opening of the borders, the Kildin S�mis are now involved in international S�mi cooperation, among other things in the S�mi Council (active in Russia, Finland, Sweden and Norway, with its main secretariat in Finland).

There is a long scholarly tradition of research on the S�mi (as well as other Uralic) languages, with important research centres including Murmansk, Helsinki, Uppsala, Troms�, Hamburg, Bloomington, Budapest, to mention a few of them. These institutions regularly publish materials on Kildin S�mi.

The Kildin S�mi literary language is in use in schools, in dictionaries, books and magazines, in international cooperation (the Kildin S�mi are one of the few minorities of Russia that have relatives abroad). Many of the Kildin S�mi books are currently being printed in Norway. The language is also in scientific use in Russia and abroad.

Issues

Importance of 10646 status

To be included in the Basic Multilingual Plane has a value in itself by virtue of serving as a reference point for the letters. Since material in Kildin S�mi is printed in different countries, this will make possible the exchange of manuscripts across the borders, and it will facilitate the printing process. International organisations such as the S�mi Council and the S�mi parliaments will also be able to publish material on Kildin S�mi via their web sites. For the 10646 standard the filling of a hole in the standard will also be important. The goal of the Basic Multilingual Plane is to represent the letters of the written languages currently in use in the world today. When it comes to written languages based on the Cyrillic and Latin alphabes, the coverage is already so good that it takes a small amount of space to make it perfect. 1) Cf. the following table. Letters denoting consonant + vowel sequences have been left out as irrelevant, thus only letters denoting vowels are shown.

		without		with diaeresis
vowel		diaeresis
A		0410, 0430		04D2, 04D3
E		042D, 044D
I		0418, 0438		04E4, 04E5
O		041E, 043E		04E6, 04E7
U		0423, 0443		04F0, 04F1
YERU		042B, 044B		04F8, 04F9
SCHWA		04D8, 04D9		04DA, 04DB
BARRED O	04E8, 04E9		04EA, 04EB

The missing diaeresis for E has consequences beyond Kildin S�mi: It makes it harder to use the Cyrillic alphabet in a symmetric way in e.g. dialectology. Assigning a special sound value to the WITH DIAERESIS vowel symbols is problematic when just one of the vowel symbols does not have any WITH DIAERESIS option.

Names and code table

04C5	CYRILLIC CAPITAL LETTER EL WITH DESCENDER
04C6	CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER EL WITH DESCENDER
04C9	CYRILLIC CAPITAL LETTER ER WITH TICK
04CA	CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER ER WITH TICK
04FA	CYRILLIC CAPITAL LETTER E WITH DIAERESIS
04FB	CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER E WITH DIAERESIS
04FC	CYRILLIC CAPITAL LETTER SHORT I WITH DESCENDER
04FD	CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER SHORT I WITH DESCENDER
04FE	CYRILLIC CAPITAL LETTER EM WITH DESCENDER
04FF	CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER EM WITH DESCENDER

T�ir go dt� inn�acs EGT (Go to the EGT index)

Michael Everson, everson@indigo.ie, Dublin, 1997-06-09

1. Relevant SC 2/WG 2 document numbers:	�
2. Status (list of meeting number and corresponding action or disposition)	�
3. Additional contact to user communities, liaison organizations etc.	�
4. Assigned category and assigned priority/time frame	�
Other Comments	�