Begin forwarded message:
Date: Sun, 12 Nov 1995 16:03:39 -0500
Reply-To: mailext@list.cren.net
Sender: owner-iso10646@listproc.hcf.jhu.edu
From: Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no
To: mailext@list.cren.net
Cc: http-wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com, html-wg@oclc.org,
iso10646@listproc.hcf.jhu.edu, ietf-mixer@innosoft.com
Subject: Reopening RFC 1766 - Language Tags
X-Sender: hta@dale.uninett.no
X-Listprocessor-Version: 7.1 -- ListProcessor by CREN
Hi,
this message is CCed to a lot of lists, and I'm asking people to spread
it even further; copy it to any list you think should be invited to
participate.
BUT: PLEASE keep replies to me and the MAILEXT mailing list!
The language tags RFC, RFC 1766, is a Proposed Standard, and is now
nine months old.
It has been very actively referenced in other Internet standards discussions,
but I don't know of any usage of it that can really be called
"implementations".
I also have had two change requests on the document:
- To add a syntax for describing matching rules, so that, for instance,
one could ask for language "en" and have the tag "en-cockney" match
- To add syntax for one or more larger language repertoires. In particular
the Summer Institute of Linguistics' Ethnologue 3-character codes has
been suggested.
I would therefore ask community input on the following points:
- Should the document be progressed to Draft Standard? This requires no
additional functionality, and at least some implementation experience
- Should the document be revised, and recycled as Proposed?
If the second option is chosen, I would ask further:
- Are there changes beyond the two I mentioned needed?
- Do we want three-letter codes? If so, how?
- Do we want matching rules? If so, how?
Please reply to me or to the mailext list (reply-to of this message is
set to mailext).
To subscribe to mailext, I believe the correct invocation is a message
to listproc@list.cren.net with "subscribe mailext" in the body.
Harald T. Alvestrand
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:30 EDT