Re: (SC22WG20.1682) Tibetan half digits

From: Michael Everson (everson@indigo.ie)
Date: Thu Oct 24 1996 - 12:29:02 EDT


At 11:23 1996-10-24, Alain LaBont/e'/ wrote:

>>There are pretty much two choices: give a numeric value (/3 = 2.5) or call
>>it a variant (3-Tibetan-plain vs. 3-Tibetan-variant). The latter would be
>>easier, but not so correct I think.
>
>I would not do that.

You would not do what? Sort give them a numeric value or call them variants
of the Tibetan numbers (like Arabic-Indic and Extended Arabic-Indic)?

--
Michael Everson, Everson Gunn Teoranta
15 Port Chaeimhghein Íochtarach; Baile Átha Cliath 2; Éire (Ireland)
Gutháin:  +353 1 478-2597, +353 1 283-9396
http://www.indigo.ie/egt
27 Páirc an Fhéithlinn; Baile an Bhóthair; Co. Átha Cliath; Éire



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:32 EDT