Re: (SC22WG20.1682) Tibetan half digits

From: Michael Everson ([email protected])
Date: Thu Oct 24 1996 - 12:29:02 EDT


At 11:23 1996-10-24, Alain LaBont/e'/ wrote:

>>There are pretty much two choices: give a numeric value (/3 = 2.5) or call
>>it a variant (3-Tibetan-plain vs. 3-Tibetan-variant). The latter would be
>>easier, but not so correct I think.
>
>I would not do that.

You would not do what? Sort give them a numeric value or call them variants
of the Tibetan numbers (like Arabic-Indic and Extended Arabic-Indic)?

--
Michael Everson, Everson Gunn Teoranta
15 Port Chaeimhghein �ochtarach; Baile �tha Cliath 2; �ire (Ireland)
Guth�in:  +353 1 478-2597, +353 1 283-9396
http://www.indigo.ie/egt
27 P�irc an Fh�ithlinn; Baile an Bh�thair; Co. �tha Cliath; �ire



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:32 EDT