RE: Arabic variants of comma, semicolon and question mark.

From: Kenneth Whistler (kenw@sybase.com)
Date: Thu Jan 23 1997 - 16:24:53 EST

Next message: Michael Forgey: "Re: Tibetan stacks"
Previous message: Jonathan Rosenne: "RE: Arabic variants of comma, semicolon and question mark."
Maybe in reply to: Jonathan Rosenne: "Arabic variants of comma, semicolon and question mark."
Next in thread: Jonathan Rosenne: "RE: Arabic variants of comma, semicolon and question mark."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> In Arabic they are separate codes

And lest we deep-end on philosophical discussions regarding
completeness of the mirrored character list, and why there
is some such behavior in Arabic but not in Hebrew, please
note that the proximate reason why U+060C, U+061B, and U+061F
are separately encoded in Unicode is because they were/are
separately encoded in ISO 8859-6.

--Ken Whistler

Next message: Michael Forgey: "Re: Tibetan stacks"
Previous message: Jonathan Rosenne: "RE: Arabic variants of comma, semicolon and question mark."
Maybe in reply to: Jonathan Rosenne: "Arabic variants of comma, semicolon and question mark."
Next in thread: Jonathan Rosenne: "RE: Arabic variants of comma, semicolon and question mark."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:33 EDT