Re: Simple C++ compiler test. How does yours fare?

From: Joe Ross (joe.ross@tivoli.tivoli.com)
Date: Mon Feb 03 1997 - 10:56:00 EST

Next message: Mark Davis: "Re: regular expressions"
Previous message: Mark Leisher: "Re: Simple C++ compiler test. How does yours fare?"
Maybe in reply to: Doug Schiffer: "Simple C++ compiler test. How does yours fare?"
Next in thread: John Cowan: "Re: Simple C++ compiler test. How does yours fare?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

unicode@Unicode.ORG wrote:
>
> I coded a very simple test of the level of support for
> wide character strings in a C/C++ compiler. Unfortunately
> it shows that there are still compilers out there that
> will have trouble even at the entry level of Unicode functionality.
>

There is nothing which states that the wchar_t encoding must be Unicode.
It is up to the implementation. However, I think that it makes sense,
and a Unicode wchar_t encoding is very useful for processes which must
execute in multiple locales.

-- 
=====================================================================
Joe Ross                                          joe.ross@tivoli.com
Tivoli Systems Internationalization                     (512)436-8863
=====================================================================

Next message: Mark Davis: "Re: regular expressions"
Previous message: Mark Leisher: "Re: Simple C++ compiler test. How does yours fare?"
Maybe in reply to: Doug Schiffer: "Simple C++ compiler test. How does yours fare?"
Next in thread: John Cowan: "Re: Simple C++ compiler test. How does yours fare?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:33 EDT