Re: Resolving dotted and dotless "i"

From: Mark Davis (
Date: Thu Sep 11 1997 - 15:27:18 EDT

I also want to note that a proposal (submitted earlier by different
people) for the addition of these characters had already been considered
and rejected by the UTC some time ago.


Joan Aliprand wrote:

> REPLY TO 09/10/97 13:04 FROM UNICODE@UNICODE.ORG: Resolving dotted and
> dotless
> "i"
> John Cowan requested re his paper on Resolving dotted and dotless "i":
> > Note to UTC Secretary: Please acknowledge receipt of this proposal.
> E-mail received.
> The next meeting of the UTC (a joint meeting with Technical Committee
> L2)
> will be on December 3-5 in Mountain View, CA.
> It must be understood that no guarantee can be made that a particular
> proposal will be discussed at a specific UTC meeting. In the past, it
> has
> occasionally been necessary to defer some agenda items of lower
> priority to
> the next meeting when there has been lengthy discussion on other
> topics.
> -- Joan Aliprand
> Chair, Unicode Technical Committee

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:36 EDT