Re: Etruscan

From: Michael Everson ([email protected])
Date: Mon Nov 03 1997 - 15:10:21 EST


Ar 01:04 -0800 1997-11-03, scr�obh Martin J. D�rst:

>For Etruscan as well as Hieroglyphs,..., the situation is almost the
>same. RTL is more frequent in the ancient texts, LTR seems more
>popular for mixed scholarly texts.

This is NOT true for Egyptian. Both directions are frequently used in
Egyptian of all periods.

>- The fact that BIDI implementations will have difficulties to be
> updated with new character properties when new characters
> are added (this would in essence be a strong suggestion that
> everything except U+0580-U+7FF is LTR) would get consideration

No way. This is already broken by the existence of Plane 1.

--
Michael Everson, EGT * http://www.indigo.ie/egt
15 Port Chaeimhghein �ochtarach; Baile �tha Cliath 2; �ire (Ireland)
Guth�in:  +353 1 478-2597, +353 1 283-9396
27 P�irc an Fh�ithlinn; Baile an Bh�thair; Co. �tha Cliath; �ire



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:37 EDT