On 7/15/98 3:37 PM, Harry Weeks (harry@entelech.com) wrote:
>I was not intending to initiate a digressionary thread, only to point
>out a ready hard-copy reference source illustrating some variant forms.
>
>
Actually, I agree that this sort of thing is very useful. The first
edition of the Unicode book included a section showing off some possible
different typographical variations for ideographs; personally, I'd be
happier if space considerations hadn't forced it out of the second
edition.
=====
John H. Jenkins
jenkins@apple.com
tseng@blueneptune.com
http://www.blueneptune.com/~tseng
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:40 EDT