Re: DIS-10646.1 of 1990/91

• Next message: Rick McGowan: "Re: Glyphs of new Unicode 3.0 symbols"
• Previous message: Frank da Cruz: "Re: UCS Terminal Emulation Draft"
• Maybe in reply to: Roman Czyborra: "DIS-10646.1 of 1990/91"
• Next in thread: Roman Czyborra: "Re: DIS-10646.1 of 1990/91"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Roman wrote...

>Your local standards archaeologist is wondering if anybody has more
>information about the voted-down DIS-10646.1 of 1990/91?
> Didn't the vote hurt anybody's feelings?

Of course it did. It was an extremly upleasant episode in history for many people.

I suggest that if you are actually intersted in history, you interview
people *OFF* *LINE*! and do not bring up these subjects here. That's my
opinion.

        Rick

• Next message: Rick McGowan: "Re: Glyphs of new Unicode 3.0 symbols"
• Previous message: Frank da Cruz: "Re: UCS Terminal Emulation Draft"
• Maybe in reply to: Roman Czyborra: "DIS-10646.1 of 1990/91"
• Next in thread: Roman Czyborra: "Re: DIS-10646.1 of 1990/91"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:43 EDT