Understanding UTF-8 and ISO correlation's.

• Next message: Markus Kuhn: "UTF-7 is dead"
• Previous message: John Wilcock: "unicode-1-1-utf7"
• Next in thread: A. Vine: "Re: Understanding UTF-8 and ISO correlation's."
• Maybe reply: A. Vine: "Re: Understanding UTF-8 and ISO correlation's."
• Maybe reply: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: Understanding UTF-8 and ISO correlation's."
• Maybe reply: schererm@us.ibm.com: "Re: Understanding UTF-8 and ISO correlation's."
• Maybe reply: G. Adam Stanislav: "Re: Understanding UTF-8 and ISO correlation's."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Hello,

I am James Liptak and trying to understand the correlation between UTF-8 and
ISO standards. From what I can see we have ISO -10646 is the mapping but
then goes on to saying ISO-8859 -1 (Latin- 1) not the Extended Latin
8859 -2.

My question is: Does UTF-8 use all of ISO - 8859 -(1-9) or is it specific
and only handles specific parts of ISO - 8859 which according the
publication V2.0 of Unicode standard is vague.

James Liptak
Jamie@intermind.com

• Next message: Markus Kuhn: "UTF-7 is dead"
• Previous message: John Wilcock: "unicode-1-1-utf7"
• Next in thread: A. Vine: "Re: Understanding UTF-8 and ISO correlation's."
• Maybe reply: A. Vine: "Re: Understanding UTF-8 and ISO correlation's."
• Maybe reply: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: Understanding UTF-8 and ISO correlation's."
• Maybe reply: schererm@us.ibm.com: "Re: Understanding UTF-8 and ISO correlation's."
• Maybe reply: G. Adam Stanislav: "Re: Understanding UTF-8 and ISO correlation's."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:46 EDT