RE: dotless j

From: Jonathan Rosenne (rosenne@qsm.co.il)
Date: Mon Jul 05 1999 - 07:40:08 EDT


Maybe we should rather call it a pointless j?

Jony

> -----Original Message-----
> Luke Stevens wrote:
> >
> > Just an observation--
> > if there is a dotless i, why not a dotless j? You can't apply many of
> > the usual combining diacritics (e.g. a macron) to j because the dot is
> > in the way. And yes, this is actually a problem for me from time to
> > time.
> >
> > Luke Stevens



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:48 EDT