Re: Unicode in source

From: Rick McGowan (rmcgowan@apple.com)
Date: Fri Jul 23 1999 - 13:04:36 EDT

Next message: John Cowan: "Re: Unicode in source"
Previous message: lisam@us.ibm.com: "Unicode Conference Reminder"
Maybe in reply to: G. Adam Stanislav: "Re: Unicode in source"
Next in thread: John Cowan: "Re: Unicode in source"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

John Cowan wrote:

> Yes, sorry, WinNT supports UTF-16-LE, and writes a correct BOM,
> (first two bytes are FE FF), but it will not process UTF-16-BE
> even *with* a correct BOM; it assumes the local code page instead.

Huh? {FE,FF} is a big-endian BOM. {FF,FE} would be a little-endian BOM.
Which is it really?

Rick

Next message: John Cowan: "Re: Unicode in source"
Previous message: lisam@us.ibm.com: "Unicode Conference Reminder"
Maybe in reply to: G. Adam Stanislav: "Re: Unicode in source"
Next in thread: John Cowan: "Re: Unicode in source"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:48 EDT