Re: Unicode 3.0 press statements

From: mark.davis@us.ibm.com
Date: Wed Jan 19 2000 - 19:15:19 EST


I seem to remember discussion of Kurdish some time ago. Which Kurdish
letters cannot be represented by a sequence of Unicode characters?

Mark
___
Mark Davis, IBM Center for Java Technology, Cupertino
(408) 777-5850 [fax: 5891], mark.davis@us.ibm.com, president@unicode.org
http://maps.yahoo.com/py/maps.py?Pyt=Tmap&addr=10275+N.+De+Anza&csz=95014

Roozbeh Pournader <roozbeh@sina.sharif.ac.ir> on 2000/01/19 01:16:39 PM

To: Mark Davis/Cupertino/IBM@IBMUS
cc: Unicode List <unicode@unicode.org>
Subject: Re: Unicode 3.0 press statements

Something not that much related: if you wanted to count the number of
languages, do not include Kurdish. Unicode doesn't have all the letters
used in Iranian Kurdish.

--Roozbeh

On Wed, 19 Jan 2000, mark.davis@us.ibm.com wrote:

> I thought it would be useful to query this group for sample statements
> along these lines, statements that would both:
>
> a) catch people's attention
> b) be true!
>
> For example, "scripts" don't mean anything to the average Joe;
"languages"
> or "countries" do. Yet our focus is in the Consortium is on scripts: I
> don't know what percent of the language coverage we have (some of you may
> have a better notion). On the other hand, I have no doubt that in terms
of
> the percentage of text currently represented in computers, that Unicode
> covers over 99% of the usage. So, sometimes the statements have to be
> worded appropriately.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:58 EDT