Re: 100%

From: John Cowan (jcowan@reutershealth.com)
Date: Wed Jan 26 2000 - 15:33:10 EST

Next message: Robert A. Rosenberg: "Re: New Unicode blurb"
Previous message: John Cowan: "Re: 100%"
Maybe in reply to: Rick McGowan: "Re: 100%"
Next in thread: Yung-Fong Tang: "Re: 100%"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Rick McGowan wrote:

> Oh you mean NAXI!

The "x" represents IPA [x], so "kh" is also a plausible representation
that cannot be confused with Pinyin "x" (IPA [\u0255]).

> or "Moso" as it's also called. This is a non-Han
> ideographic script that is in current use. The scholars in China should
> probably propose it for encoding

I think it should not be encoded; see previous posting.
The Naxi syllabary (about which I have
essentially no information) might be a candidate.

-- 
Schlingt dreifach einen Kreis vom dies! || John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Schliesst euer Aug vor heiliger Schau,  || http://www.reutershealth.com
Denn er genoss vom Honig-Tau,           || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Und trank die Milch vom Paradies.            -- Coleridge (tr. Politzer)

Next message: Robert A. Rosenberg: "Re: New Unicode blurb"
Previous message: John Cowan: "Re: 100%"
Maybe in reply to: Rick McGowan: "Re: 100%"
Next in thread: Yung-Fong Tang: "Re: 100%"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:58 EDT