From: "Robert Brady" <robert@susu.org.uk>
> > I don't need excuse because using utf-16. My pages are well readable on
> >web browsers which support Unicode.
>
> "It works for me" is not a sufficiently good reason to do something.
For you or for me ?
On MY platform it is NATIVE coding. I use it DIRECTLY without ANY work.
>Why
> not use
>
> a) ASCII, with character entity references
ASCII ? Why not use Morse's code with entities ?
> b) UTF-8
What for, EXACTLY ?!
> both of which are INFINITELY preferable to the sick idea of using UTF-16
> for web pages.
Utf-16 is another encodings. Even if today isn't very popular, software which support it is very popular.
> > > Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-16
> >
> > Tell this to server which public my pages.
>
> That's your problem, not mine.
I have no problem. :-)))
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:59 EDT