Re: Unicode90

From: Peter Constable (peter_constable@sil.org)
Date: Thu Mar 09 2000 - 08:29:55 EST

Next message: Tom Emerson: "RE: Hangzhou-style numerals"
Previous message: G. Adam Stanislav: "Re: UTF-7 (was: RE: U+xxxx, U-xxxxxx, and the basics)"
Maybe in reply to: Kenneth Whistler: "Unicode90"
Next in thread: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: Unicode90"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

>Ken, a few stuff for your historical records:

>http://www.unicode.com/
>http://www.unicode.it/
>http://www.unicode.net.au/

All of which have nothing whatever to do with Unicode. *Very*
bad taste, IMO.

Peter

Next message: Tom Emerson: "RE: Hangzhou-style numerals"
Previous message: G. Adam Stanislav: "Re: UTF-7 (was: RE: U+xxxx, U-xxxxxx, and the basics)"
Maybe in reply to: Kenneth Whistler: "Unicode90"
Next in thread: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: Unicode90"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:59 EDT