Re: Sorting Numbers

From: Robert A. Rosenberg (bob.rosenberg@digitscorp.com)
Date: Mon Mar 13 2000 - 17:22:37 EST

Next message: A. Vine: "Re: DIN 5007, Swiss Sorting"
Previous message: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: Sorting Numbers"
Maybe in reply to: Markus Kuhn: "Re: Sorting Numbers"
Next in thread: Jonathan Coxhead: "Re: Sorting Numbers"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 10:35 AM 03/13/2000 -0800, Markus Kuhn wrote:
>"Robert A. Rosenberg" wrote on 2000-03-13 16:19 UTC:
> > At 04:24 AM 03/13/2000 -0800, Markus Kuhn wrote:
> > > Light bulb, 100 W
> > >
> > >should be sorted before
> > >
> > > Light bulb, 90 W
>
>Should of course have been the other way round, i.e. "after". Sorry
>for the confusion.

No problem. NOW it is consistent <g>.

>Markus
>
>--
>Markus G. Kuhn, Computer Laboratory, University of Cambridge, UK
>Email: mkuhn at acm.org, WWW: <http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/>

Next message: A. Vine: "Re: DIN 5007, Swiss Sorting"
Previous message: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: Sorting Numbers"
Maybe in reply to: Markus Kuhn: "Re: Sorting Numbers"
Next in thread: Jonathan Coxhead: "Re: Sorting Numbers"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:59 EDT