Re: COPYLEFT SIGN

From: G. Adam Stanislav (adam@whizkidtech.net)
Date: Tue May 16 2000 - 11:13:02 EDT

Next message: John Cowan: "Re: COPYLEFT SIGN"
Previous message: Peter_Constable@sil.org: "Re: Transliteration of Arabic characters into English"
Maybe in reply to: Bernd Warken: "Re: COPYLEFT SIGN"
Next in thread: John Cowan: "Re: COPYLEFT SIGN"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 06:22 16-05-2000 -0800, Doug Ewell wrote:
>U+2122 TRADE MARK SIGN is not encoded in ISO 8859-1, nor any other part
>of ISO 8859-1. It is widely encoded in vendor character sets, though.
>Windows character sets place it at 0x99.

I stand corrected.

Next message: John Cowan: "Re: COPYLEFT SIGN"
Previous message: Peter_Constable@sil.org: "Re: Transliteration of Arabic characters into English"
Maybe in reply to: Bernd Warken: "Re: COPYLEFT SIGN"
Next in thread: John Cowan: "Re: COPYLEFT SIGN"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:02 EDT