Re: U+3007 not a Hanzi?

From: James Kass (jameskass@worldnet.att.net)
Date: Tue Oct 03 2000 - 18:46:03 EDT

Next message: Raghu Kolluru: "unicode translator"
Previous message: Chris Wendt: "RE: Unicode site"
Maybe in reply to: 11digitboy@bolt.com: "U+3007 not a Hanzi?"
Next in thread: Ayers, Mike: "RE: U+3007 not a Hanzi?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

----- Original Message -----
From: <11digitboy@bolt.com>
To: "Unicode List" <unicode@unicode.org>
Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2000 2:29 PM
Subject: U+3007 not a Hanzi?

> I have seen U+3007 classified as a Hanzi. Why is
> it not considered a Hanzi in Unicode? Because it
> is the only Hanzi that uses that stroke??
> If it is not a Hanzi, what, then, is it?
>

It's nothing, really, but graphically it's a
full-width circle.

Best regards,

James Kass.

Next message: Raghu Kolluru: "unicode translator"
Previous message: Chris Wendt: "RE: Unicode site"
Maybe in reply to: 11digitboy@bolt.com: "U+3007 not a Hanzi?"
Next in thread: Ayers, Mike: "RE: U+3007 not a Hanzi?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:14 EDT