Re: boustrophedon more current, not ancient?

From: Michael Everson ([email protected])
Date: Wed Dec 20 2000 - 19:13:22 EST

Next message: Alain laBont�: "Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ?"
Previous message: Elizabeth J. Pyatt: "Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ?"
Maybe in reply to: Elaine Keown: "boustrophedon more current, not ancient?"
Next in thread: Robin Cover: "Re: boustrophedon more current, not ancient?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Ar 13:02 -0800 2000-12-20, scr�obh [email protected]:
>I have never heard of
>boustrophedon used for vertical text.

Neither have I.

Next message: Alain laBont�: "Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ?"
Previous message: Elizabeth J. Pyatt: "Re: [langue-fr] L'anglais est-il une langue universelle ?"
Maybe in reply to: Elaine Keown: "boustrophedon more current, not ancient?"
Next in thread: Robin Cover: "Re: boustrophedon more current, not ancient?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:21:17 EDT