Unicode Mail List Archive
By Date

Starting: Sun Apr 01 2001 - 00:46:13 EST
Ending: Mon Apr 30 2001 - 23:05:36 EDT

• Quoting quota considered harmful Edward Cherlin (Sun Apr 01 2001 - 01:46:28 EST)
• Re: The Unicode Standard, Version 3.1 William Overington (Sun Apr 01 2001 - 06:13:43 EDT)
• Re: The Unicode Standard, Version 3.1 James Kass (Sun Apr 01 2001 - 08:01:38 EDT)
• The Unicode Standard, Version 4.0 Mark D.K. Whistler (Sun Apr 01 2001 - 11:52:20 EDT)
• RE: The Unicode Standard, Version 4.0 Mike Lischke (Sun Apr 01 2001 - 12:55:17 EDT)
• Re: The Unicode Standard, Version 3.1 John H. Jenkins (Sun Apr 01 2001 - 14:15:26 EDT)
• Form posted from Mozilla Rick McGowan (Sun Apr 01 2001 - 15:19:38 EDT)
• Re: RE: The Unicode Standard, Version 4.0 Rick McGowan (Sun Apr 01 2001 - 15:25:30 EDT)
• New%20character%200370%20%28ORKIAN SMALL LETTER NANO NANO%29 David Gallardo (Sun Apr 01 2001 - 16:18:57 EDT)
• New%20character%20FB07%20%28LATIN%20SMALL%20LETTER%20LIGATURE%20SMALL%20CT%29&bo DougEwell2@cs.com (Sun Apr 01 2001 - 20:01:31 EDT)
• RE: The Unicode Standard, Version 4.0 Winkler, Arnold F (Sun Apr 01 2001 - 19:22:55 EDT)
• Old Persian Vladimir Ivanov (Mon Apr 02 2001 - 01:17:47 EDT)
• Re: Old Persian James Kass (Mon Apr 02 2001 - 05:14:30 EDT)
• RE: Word and Version 3.1 characters Chris Pratley (Mon Apr 02 2001 - 07:20:23 EDT)
• Re: Word and Version 3.1 characters Peter_Constable@sil.org (Mon Apr 02 2001 - 09:31:13 EDT)
• Re: The Unicode Standard, Version 3.1 Peter_Constable@sil.org (Mon Apr 02 2001 - 09:25:21 EDT)
• Re: Unicode in PDF files Sebastian Hagedorn (Mon Apr 02 2001 - 13:57:19 EDT)
• Classical Greek on a Mac Marco Piovanelli (Tue Apr 03 2001 - 05:14:13 EDT)
• Code2001 (RE: The Unicode Standard, Version 3.1) Marco Cimarosti (Tue Apr 03 2001 - 05:18:37 EDT)
• Re: Classical Greek on a Mac Sebastian Hagedorn (Tue Apr 03 2001 - 06:47:28 EDT)
• Re: Classical Greek on a Mac David J. Perry (Tue Apr 03 2001 - 07:02:22 EDT)
• Re: Code2001 (RE: The Unicode Standard, Version 3.1) James Kass (Tue Apr 03 2001 - 07:15:18 EDT)
• Re: Classical Greek on a Mac Otto Stolz (Tue Apr 03 2001 - 15:23:47 EDT)
• Re: Classical Greek on a Mac James Partridge (Tue Apr 03 2001 - 09:10:23 EDT)
• Re: Classical Greek on a Mac John Jenkins (Tue Apr 03 2001 - 10:30:35 EDT)
• Polytonic Greek Patrick T. Rourke (Tue Apr 03 2001 - 10:47:09 EDT)
• Re: Polytonic Greek Lukas Pietsch (Tue Apr 03 2001 - 12:39:03 EDT)
• RE: Thanks... Marco Cimarosti (Tue Apr 03 2001 - 13:07:50 EDT)
• Iranian Rial sign proposal Roozbeh Pournader (Tue Apr 03 2001 - 19:09:31 EDT)
• Re: Iranian Rial sign proposal 11digitboy@bolt.com (Tue Apr 03 2001 - 20:27:00 EDT)
• Re: Iranian Rial sign proposal DougEwell2@cs.com (Tue Apr 03 2001 - 21:35:28 EDT)
• Re: Iranian Rial sign proposal Michael \(michka\) Kaplan (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 00:16:15 EDT)
• Re: Iranian Rial sign proposal Michael \(michka\) Kaplan (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 00:18:57 EDT)
• Re: Iranian Rial sign proposal Michael \(michka\) Kaplan (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 00:19:55 EDT)
• Re: Iranian Rial sign proposal Michael \(michka\) Kaplan (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 00:55:26 EDT)
• Re: Classical Greek on a Mac Lukas Pietsch (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 03:56:04 EDT)
• Re: Iranian Rial sign proposal James Kass (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 05:16:30 EDT)
• Re: Classical Greek on a Mac James Kass (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 05:30:14 EDT)
• Re: Iranian Rial sign proposal Roozbeh Pournader (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 06:29:39 EDT)
• Re: Iranian Rial sign proposal Roozbeh Pournader (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 06:30:54 EDT)
• Re: Iranian Rial sign proposal Roozbeh Pournader (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 06:34:26 EDT)
• Re: Iranian Rial sign proposal Roozbeh Pournader (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 07:06:45 EDT)
• Displaying unicode..... Dennis L. Goyette Sr. (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 07:50:34 EDT)
• Re: Japanese display on Unix netscape ? Jungshik Shin (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 08:48:59 EDT)
• Re: Japanese characters don't display in the title of a page. Jungshik Shin (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 08:56:21 EDT)
• Re: Displaying unicode..... Juliusz Chroboczek (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 09:53:01 EDT)
• RE: Iranian Rial sign proposal Marco Cimarosti (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 10:03:25 EDT)
• Re: Iranian Rial sign proposal Mark Leisher (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 10:34:25 EDT)
• Re: Iranian Rial sign proposal Mark Leisher (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 10:40:40 EDT)
• RE: Iranian Rial sign proposal Carl W. Brown (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 11:17:15 EDT)
• RE: Iranian Rial sign proposal Roozbeh Pournader (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 11:20:41 EDT)
• Re: Iranian Rial sign proposal DougEwell2@cs.com (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 11:43:35 EDT)
• Re: Iranian Rial sign proposal Roozbeh Pournader (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 12:02:02 EDT)
• Re: Iranian Rial sign proposal Peter_Constable@sil.org (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 12:03:41 EDT)
• Re: Iranian Rial sign proposal Peter_Constable@sil.org (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 12:07:12 EDT)
• Putting unicode@unicode.org first (in the To:field) Marion Gunn (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 12:24:30 EDT)
• Re: Displaying unicode..... Jungshik Shin (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 12:21:09 EDT)
• RE: Iranian Rial sign proposal Roozbeh Pournader (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 12:34:51 EDT)
• Re: Iranian Rial sign proposal Michael Everson (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 12:36:25 EDT)
• Re: Iranian Rial sign proposal Robert Brady (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 12:20:27 EDT)
• Re: Putting unicode@unicode.org first (in the To:field) Peter_Constable@sil.org (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 13:22:13 EDT)
• Re: Iranian Rial sign proposal David Starner (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 13:30:54 EDT)
• Re: Iranian Rial sign proposal Roozbeh Pournader (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 14:10:19 EDT)
• RE: Putting unicode@unicode.org first (in the To:field) Carl W. Brown (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 14:13:02 EDT)
• RE: OT obsolete symbols was: Iranian Rial sign proposal Marco Cimarosti (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 14:28:41 EDT)
• Re: Mac OSX + 17,500 Kanji Jim DeLaHunt (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 14:41:05 EDT)
• Unicode savvy concordance software? Nesbitt, Gavin (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 14:54:29 EDT)
• Re: Iranian Rial sign proposal Roozbeh Pournader (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 14:57:09 EDT)
• Re: Iranian Rial sign proposal Michael Everson (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 15:05:21 EDT)
• RE: Iranian Rial sign proposal Nick NICHOLAS (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 15:24:44 EDT)
• RE: Putting unicode@unicode.org first (in the To:field) Roozbeh Pournader (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 15:37:09 EDT)
• Re: Unicode savvy concordance software? Mark Leisher (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 15:57:36 EDT)
• Re: Iranian Rial sign proposal Rick McGowan (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 16:34:34 EDT)
• Re: Putting unicode@unicode.org first (in the To:field) Tex Texin (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 16:42:02 EDT)
• Re: Iranian Rial sign proposal Roozbeh Pournader (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 16:52:48 EDT)
• RE: OT obsolete symbols was: Iranian Rial sign proposal Carl W. Brown (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 17:47:18 EDT)
• Re: Iranian Rial sign proposal Roozbeh Pournader (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 18:06:05 EDT)
• Re: Iranian Rial sign proposal Rick McGowan (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 18:31:08 EDT)
• RE: Iranian Rial sign proposal Michael Everson (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 19:56:34 EDT)
• RE: Iranian Rial sign proposal Roozbeh Pournader (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 21:39:25 EDT)
• Unihan errors Edward Cherlin (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 22:26:21 EDT)
• Re: Unihan errors John Jenkins (Wed Apr 04 2001 - 23:09:43 EDT)
• RE: Iranian Rial sign proposal Michael Everson (Thu Apr 05 2001 - 00:35:00 EDT)
• Re: Unicode savvy concordance software? Otto Stolz (Thu Apr 05 2001 - 12:25:40 EDT)
• RE: Iranian Rial sign proposal Marco Cimarosti (Thu Apr 05 2001 - 05:11:31 EDT)
• Re: Iranian Rial sign proposal Michael \(michka\) Kaplan (Thu Apr 05 2001 - 07:42:35 EDT)
• RE: Iranian Rial sign proposal Marco Cimarosti (Thu Apr 05 2001 - 09:30:07 EDT)
• RE: Iranian Rial sign proposal Roozbeh Pournader (Thu Apr 05 2001 - 09:34:38 EDT)
• Re: Iranian Rial sign proposal Michael \(michka\) Kaplan (Thu Apr 05 2001 - 09:36:47 EDT)
• Re: Mac OSX + 17,500 Kanji Berthold Frommann (Thu Apr 05 2001 - 10:20:58 EDT)
• RE: Iranian Rial sign proposal Marco Cimarosti (Thu Apr 05 2001 - 13:07:23 EDT)
• Re: Mac OSX + 17,500 Kanji Jim DeLaHunt (Thu Apr 05 2001 - 13:41:54 EDT)
• RE: Unicode savvy concordance software? Richard Kunst (Fri Apr 06 2001 - 11:50:53 EDT)
• Digits in Unicode Names Dean A. Snyder (Fri Apr 06 2001 - 11:54:59 EDT)
• Range error Edward Cherlin (Fri Apr 06 2001 - 14:36:34 EDT)
• Re: Digits in Unicode Names Dean A. Snyder (Fri Apr 06 2001 - 14:39:43 EDT)
• Re: Digits in Unicode Names Dennis L. Goyette (Fri Apr 06 2001 - 14:51:16 EDT)
• Re: Digits in Unicode Names Keld Jørn Simonsen (Fri Apr 06 2001 - 17:26:09 EDT)
• RE: Digits in Unicode Names Yves Arrouye (Fri Apr 06 2001 - 18:52:59 EDT)
• Re: Range error (OT Display Issue) James Kass (Fri Apr 06 2001 - 19:17:58 EDT)
• How many noncharacters, unassigned and private area code points in 3.1. Patrick Andries (Fri Apr 06 2001 - 19:32:27 EDT)
• RE: Digits in Unicode Names Nelson H. F. Beebe (Fri Apr 06 2001 - 20:14:54 EDT)
• Re: [unicode] Re: Unicode editing Roozbeh Pournader (Fri Apr 06 2001 - 20:42:24 EDT)
• Re: How many noncharacters, unassigned and private area code points in 3.1. James Kass (Fri Apr 06 2001 - 21:25:33 EDT)
• Too many Han (was: Re: How many noncharacters, unassigned and private area code points in 3.1.) 11digitboy@bolt.com (Fri Apr 06 2001 - 23:30:33 EDT)
• The Code 2000 font. 11digitboy@bolt.com (Sat Apr 07 2001 - 00:56:53 EDT)
• Re: Too many Han (was: Re: How many noncharacters, unassigned and private area code points in 3.1.) James Kass (Sat Apr 07 2001 - 06:32:25 EDT)
• RichEdit v.4 common control in Win98? Lukas Pietsch (Sat Apr 07 2001 - 07:01:15 EDT)
• Re: RichEdit v.4 common control in Win98? Marc Durdin (Sat Apr 07 2001 - 09:17:39 EDT)
• Re: RichEdit v.4 common control in Win98? Michael \(michka\) Kaplan (Sat Apr 07 2001 - 09:46:41 EDT)
• Re: RichEdit v.4 common control in Win98? Peter_Constable@sil.org (Sat Apr 07 2001 - 14:12:29 EDT)
• Re: RichEdit v.4 common control in Win98? Michael \(michka\) Kaplan (Sat Apr 07 2001 - 15:01:03 EDT)
• Re: Too many Han (was: Re: How many noncharacters, unassigned and private area code points in 3.1.) John Cowan (Sat Apr 07 2001 - 17:25:23 EDT)
• Re: RichEdit v.4 common control in Win98? Peter_Constable@sil.org (Sun Apr 08 2001 - 20:56:27 EDT)
• Ruby Annotation and XHTML 1.1 are W3C Proposed Recommendations Martin Duerst (Sun Apr 08 2001 - 23:13:00 EDT)
• RE: Too many Han (was: Re: How many noncharacters, unassigned and private area code points in 3.1.) Marco Cimarosti (Mon Apr 09 2001 - 05:38:29 EDT)
• Code charts Tomas McGuinness (Mon Apr 09 2001 - 05:48:52 EDT)
• RE: Code charts Vaintroub, Wladislav (Mon Apr 09 2001 - 07:00:29 EDT)
• 3.1 code charts Roozbeh Pournader (Mon Apr 09 2001 - 07:04:36 EDT)
• RE: Code charts Tomas McGuinness (Mon Apr 09 2001 - 07:35:46 EDT)
• Is my file UTF8 Bhavdeep Singh, Gurgaon (Mon Apr 09 2001 - 07:58:15 EDT)
• Re: Too many Han (was: Re: How many noncharacters, unassigned and private area code points in 3.1.) John Cowan (Mon Apr 09 2001 - 11:50:16 EDT)
• ucs in C and C++ Keld Jørn Simonsen (Mon Apr 09 2001 - 12:54:55 EDT)
• RE: Ruby Annotation and XHTML 1.1 are W3C Proposed Recommendations Carl W. Brown (Mon Apr 09 2001 - 13:00:28 EDT)
• FW: persian languge Magda Danish (Unicode) (Mon Apr 09 2001 - 16:18:57 EDT)
• RE: Code charts Marco Cimarosti (Tue Apr 10 2001 - 03:41:27 EDT)
• RE: Why win32 ANSI api does not work with Indic Scripts? Marco Cimarosti (Tue Apr 10 2001 - 04:15:16 EDT)
• RE: The Code 2000 font. Marco Cimarosti (Tue Apr 10 2001 - 04:58:13 EDT)
• Re: Digits in Unicode Names Antoine Leca (Tue Apr 10 2001 - 05:14:42 EDT)
• Byte Order Marks Tomas McGuinness (Tue Apr 10 2001 - 05:49:58 EDT)
• gb2312 Tomas McGuinness (Tue Apr 10 2001 - 06:09:45 EDT)
• RE: gb2312 Marco Cimarosti (Tue Apr 10 2001 - 08:37:26 EDT)
• Re: Unicode savvy concordance software? Otto Stolz (Tue Apr 10 2001 - 17:20:43 EDT)
• Re: gb2312 Jungshik Shin (Tue Apr 10 2001 - 10:00:29 EDT)
• Re: Byte Order Marks DougEwell2@cs.com (Tue Apr 10 2001 - 11:50:30 EDT)
• Re: The Code2000 font. James Kass (Tue Apr 10 2001 - 11:00:09 EDT)
• RE: Ruby Annotation and XHTML 1.1 are W3C Proposed Recommendations Martin Duerst (Tue Apr 10 2001 - 21:49:25 EDT)
• Re: ucs in C and C++ Dennis L. Goyette (Wed Apr 11 2001 - 05:48:55 EDT)
• Re: The Code2000 font. Dennis L. Goyette (Wed Apr 11 2001 - 07:38:55 EDT)
• compatible applications Poulos,Stephen (Wed Apr 11 2001 - 09:18:04 EDT)
• Re: compatible applications Sebastian Hagedorn (Wed Apr 11 2001 - 10:28:03 EDT)
• RE: Unicode editing Marco Cimarosti (Wed Apr 11 2001 - 10:56:46 EDT)
• Re: compatible applications Dean A. Snyder (Wed Apr 11 2001 - 10:57:09 EDT)
• RE: Ruby Annotation and XHTML 1.1 are W3C Proposed Recommendation s Ayers, Mike (Wed Apr 11 2001 - 12:02:43 EDT)
• Re: The Code2000 font. David Starner (Wed Apr 11 2001 - 12:06:55 EDT)
• Re: The Code2000 font. Dennis L. Goyette (Wed Apr 11 2001 - 12:02:24 EDT)
• Re: Ruby Annotation and XHTML 1.1 are W3C Proposed Recommendations Berthold Frommann (Wed Apr 11 2001 - 16:22:23 EDT)
• Re: Ruby Annotation and XHTML 1.1 are W3C Proposed Recommendation s Berthold Frommann (Wed Apr 11 2001 - 16:22:19 EDT)
• RE: Why win32 ANSI api does not work with Indic Scripts? F. Avery Bishop (Wed Apr 11 2001 - 15:56:04 EDT)
• Re: Why win32 ANSI api does not work with Indic Scripts? Michael \(michka\) Kaplan (Wed Apr 11 2001 - 18:06:54 EDT)
• Sun's Java encodings vs IANA's character set registry Mike Brown (Wed Apr 11 2001 - 20:59:48 EDT)
• Re: Ruby Annotation and XHTML 1.1 are W3C Proposed Recommendation s Shigeki Moro (Thu Apr 12 2001 - 04:01:31 EDT)
• Unicode Collation Algorithm Neil Shadrach (Thu Apr 12 2001 - 05:34:02 EDT)
• Re: Unicode Collation Algorithm Keld Jørn Simonsen (Thu Apr 12 2001 - 07:11:22 EDT)
• RE: Unicode editing Bob_Hallissy@sil.org (Thu Apr 12 2001 - 08:27:37 EDT)
• Japanese Font Support Craig Ian Thomas (Thu Apr 12 2001 - 08:17:01 EDT)
• RE: Why win32 ANSI api does not work with Indic Scripts? Suzanne M. Topping (Thu Apr 12 2001 - 09:37:14 EDT)
• RE: Unicode editing Marco Cimarosti (Thu Apr 12 2001 - 10:34:25 EDT)
• 18th Unicode Conference, April 2001, Hong Kong -- Final reminder Lisa Moore (Thu Apr 12 2001 - 12:21:12 EDT)
• RE: Unicode editing Marco Cimarosti (Thu Apr 12 2001 - 12:39:02 EDT)
• RE: Sun's Java encodings vs IANA's character set registry Mike Brown (Thu Apr 12 2001 - 12:54:40 EDT)
• FYI... Sarasvati (Thu Apr 12 2001 - 13:07:37 EDT)
• Re: FYI... 11digitboy@bolt.com (Thu Apr 12 2001 - 17:39:11 EDT)
• RE: Ruby Annotation and XHTML 1.1 are W3C Proposed Recommendations Carl W. Brown (Thu Apr 12 2001 - 18:06:47 EDT)
• Re: Unicode Collation Algorithm Kenneth Whistler (Thu Apr 12 2001 - 18:37:31 EDT)
• Re: FYI... Kenneth Whistler (Thu Apr 12 2001 - 19:48:12 EDT)
• RE: Sun's Java encodings vs IANA's character set registry Yves Arrouye (Thu Apr 12 2001 - 22:44:41 EDT)
• benefits of unicode Tex Texin (Thu Apr 12 2001 - 23:12:40 EDT)
• Re: benefits of unicode Michael \(michka\) Kaplan (Thu Apr 12 2001 - 23:32:22 EDT)
• [Fwd: benefits of unicode] Tex Texin (Thu Apr 12 2001 - 23:44:08 EDT)
• Re: benefits of unicode Michael \(michka\) Kaplan (Thu Apr 12 2001 - 23:43:45 EDT)
• Re: benefits of unicode Tex Texin (Fri Apr 13 2001 - 00:06:03 EDT)
• Re: benefits of unicode DougEwell2@cs.com (Fri Apr 13 2001 - 01:43:25 EDT)
• Re: benefits of unicode David Starner (Fri Apr 13 2001 - 03:09:19 EDT)
• RE: benefits of unicode Marco Cimarosti (Fri Apr 13 2001 - 04:17:49 EDT)
• RE: benefits of unicode Tex Texin (Fri Apr 13 2001 - 10:46:36 EDT)
• Repha Marco Cimarosti (Fri Apr 13 2001 - 12:01:48 EDT)
• Re: Unicode Collation Algorithm Roozbeh Pournader (Fri Apr 13 2001 - 13:24:25 EDT)
• Re: Sun's Java encodings vs IANA's character set registry Markus Scherer (Fri Apr 13 2001 - 14:32:16 EDT)
• Re: benefits of unicode Peter_Constable@sil.org (Fri Apr 13 2001 - 09:30:34 EDT)
• quoting (was Re: benefits of unicode Peter_Constable@sil.org (Fri Apr 13 2001 - 09:36:24 EDT)
• Re: benefits of unicode Peter_Constable@sil.org (Fri Apr 13 2001 - 09:38:59 EDT)
• Re: benefits of unicode Tex Texin (Fri Apr 13 2001 - 17:11:33 EDT)
• Re: benefits of unicode John Cowan (Fri Apr 13 2001 - 17:13:05 EDT)
• Re: benefits of unicode Michael \(michka\) Kaplan (Fri Apr 13 2001 - 17:47:01 EDT)
• Re: benefits of unicode Tex Texin (Fri Apr 13 2001 - 18:04:01 EDT)
• [Fwd: Re: benefits of unicode] Tex Texin (Fri Apr 13 2001 - 18:12:14 EDT)
• Re: Sun's Java encodings vs IANA's character set registry Keld Jørn Simonsen (Fri Apr 13 2001 - 18:10:58 EDT)
• Re: Unicode Collation Algorithm Keld Jørn Simonsen (Fri Apr 13 2001 - 18:13:26 EDT)
• Re: benefits of unicode Michael \(michka\) Kaplan (Fri Apr 13 2001 - 18:40:01 EDT)
• Re: benefits of unicode Tex Texin (Fri Apr 13 2001 - 18:53:31 EDT)
• Re: [Fwd: Re: benefits of unicode] John Cowan (Fri Apr 13 2001 - 18:51:43 EDT)
• Re: benefits of unicode Michael \(michka\) Kaplan (Fri Apr 13 2001 - 18:58:50 EDT)
• Re: benefits of unicode Tex Texin (Fri Apr 13 2001 - 19:21:17 EDT)
• Re: benefits of unicode Edward Cherlin (Fri Apr 13 2001 - 19:21:01 EDT)
• RE: benefits of unicode Yves Arrouye (Fri Apr 13 2001 - 19:34:28 EDT)
• Re: benefits of unicode Michael \(michka\) Kaplan (Fri Apr 13 2001 - 19:20:12 EDT)
• Re: benefits of unicode Andrew Cunningham (Fri Apr 13 2001 - 21:34:58 EDT)
• Re: [?UTF-8?][?UTF-8?] John Cowan (Fri Apr 13 2001 - 23:23:01 EDT)
• Re: benefits of unicode Michael \(michka\) Kaplan (Fri Apr 13 2001 - 23:33:29 EDT)
• Re: Unicode savvy concordance software? Marc Wilhelm Küster (Sat Apr 14 2001 - 03:35:44 EDT)
• Re: benefits of unicode James Kass (Sat Apr 14 2001 - 03:57:48 EDT)
• Re: benefits of unicode Roozbeh Pournader (Sat Apr 14 2001 - 16:12:28 EDT)
• Re: Unicode Bidi algorithm dissention (was: something else entirely) Michael \(michka\) Kaplan (Sat Apr 14 2001 - 17:28:56 EDT)
• RE: Unicode Bidi algorithm dissention (was: something else entirely) Jonathan Rosenne (Sun Apr 15 2001 - 01:12:28 EDT)
• Re: benefits of unicode Andrew Cunningham (Sun Apr 15 2001 - 03:08:58 EDT)
• Re: benefits of unicode Andrew Cunningham (Sun Apr 15 2001 - 03:12:46 EDT)
• Reviewing IETF documents Florian Weimer (Sun Apr 15 2001 - 14:15:18 EDT)
• Identifiers Florian Weimer (Sun Apr 15 2001 - 14:10:55 EDT)
• Re: Reviewing IETF documents DougEwell2@cs.com (Sun Apr 15 2001 - 14:45:35 EDT)
• Re: Reviewing IETF documents Tex Texin (Sun Apr 15 2001 - 16:58:52 EDT)
• Re: Reviewing IETF documents Tex Texin (Sun Apr 15 2001 - 17:01:34 EDT)
• Re: Reviewing IETF documents Florian Weimer (Sun Apr 15 2001 - 17:42:58 EDT)
• Re: Reviewing IETF documents Florian Weimer (Sun Apr 15 2001 - 17:51:02 EDT)
• Should I submit e with circumflex and macron/caron? Dave Schweisguth (Sun Apr 15 2001 - 17:55:12 EDT)
• Re: Identifiers David Starner (Sun Apr 15 2001 - 19:02:07 EDT)
• RE: Identifiers Yves Arrouye (Sun Apr 15 2001 - 19:06:26 EDT)
• Re: Identifiers Martin Duerst (Sun Apr 15 2001 - 20:24:20 EDT)
• Re: Should I submit e with circumflex and macron/caron? Peter_Constable@sil.org (Sun Apr 15 2001 - 21:37:30 EDT)
• Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) Peter_Constable@sil.org (Sun Apr 15 2001 - 21:44:44 EDT)
• Re: Reviewing IETF documents Tex Texin (Sun Apr 15 2001 - 22:31:58 EDT)
• Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) John Hudson (Sun Apr 15 2001 - 22:57:53 EDT)
• Re: Identifiers root (Sun Apr 15 2001 - 23:00:05 EDT)
• Re: Identifiers Asmus Freytag (Mon Apr 16 2001 - 03:43:11 EDT)
• Re: Reviewing IETF documents Martin Duerst (Mon Apr 16 2001 - 03:54:45 EDT)
• Re: Identifiers Florian Weimer (Mon Apr 16 2001 - 05:30:39 EDT)
• Re: Reviewing IETF documents Florian Weimer (Mon Apr 16 2001 - 05:56:16 EDT)
• Re: Identifiers Florian Weimer (Mon Apr 16 2001 - 06:04:59 EDT)
• Re: Identifiers Florian Weimer (Mon Apr 16 2001 - 06:09:42 EDT)
• Re: Identifiers John Cowan (Mon Apr 16 2001 - 06:53:12 EDT)
• RE: Identifiers Yves Arrouye (Mon Apr 16 2001 - 11:09:58 EDT)
• RE: Identifiers Yves Arrouye (Mon Apr 16 2001 - 11:12:07 EDT)
• Re: Identifiers David Starner (Mon Apr 16 2001 - 11:51:11 EDT)
• RE: Reviewing IETF documents Ayers, Mike (Mon Apr 16 2001 - 12:18:50 EDT)
• FW: Learn more about Windows XP's international features Becker, Joseph (Mon Apr 16 2001 - 12:32:26 EDT)
• Re: Reviewing IETF documents Harald Tveit Alvestrand (Mon Apr 16 2001 - 13:04:53 EDT)
• Re: Reviewing IETF documents Florian Weimer (Mon Apr 16 2001 - 14:05:31 EDT)
• Re: Reviewing IETF documents Florian Weimer (Mon Apr 16 2001 - 14:13:04 EDT)
• Re: Identifiers DougEwell2@cs.com (Mon Apr 16 2001 - 14:07:20 EDT)
• Re: Reviewing IETF documents DougEwell2@cs.com (Mon Apr 16 2001 - 14:18:30 EDT)
• Re: Identifiers Florian Weimer (Mon Apr 16 2001 - 14:37:26 EDT)
• Benefits/Microsoft Statement Suzanne M. Topping (Mon Apr 16 2001 - 14:52:27 EDT)
• Re: Reviewing IETF documents Harald Tveit Alvestrand (Mon Apr 16 2001 - 14:32:26 EDT)
• Characters not Glyphs (Was Re: Reviewing IETF documents) Kenneth Whistler (Mon Apr 16 2001 - 15:18:20 EDT)
• Re: Identifiers Kenneth Whistler (Mon Apr 16 2001 - 15:46:23 EDT)
• Re: FW: Learn more about Windows XP's international features John Hudson (Mon Apr 16 2001 - 15:52:05 EDT)
• Re: Identifiers David Starner (Mon Apr 16 2001 - 15:57:05 EDT)
• [Fwd: Re: Benefits/Microsoft Statement] Tex Texin (Mon Apr 16 2001 - 16:04:43 EDT)
• RE: Identifiers Yves Arrouye (Mon Apr 16 2001 - 16:41:58 EDT)
• RE: Identifiers Yves Arrouye (Mon Apr 16 2001 - 17:49:51 EDT)
• RE: Identifiers Yves Arrouye (Mon Apr 16 2001 - 19:36:14 EDT)
• Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) James Kass (Mon Apr 16 2001 - 22:02:16 EDT)
• Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) Andrew Cunningham (Mon Apr 16 2001 - 23:08:39 EDT)
• Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) Andrew Cunningham (Mon Apr 16 2001 - 23:26:17 EDT)
• Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) James Kass (Tue Apr 17 2001 - 01:09:00 EDT)
• How will software source code represent 21 bit unicode characters? William Overington (Tue Apr 17 2001 - 02:33:16 EDT)
• 21 bit unicode and older computing equipment William Overington (Tue Apr 17 2001 - 02:55:16 EDT)
• RE: How will software source code represent 21 bit unicode charac ters? Marco Cimarosti (Tue Apr 17 2001 - 04:20:14 EDT)
• RE: How will software source code represent 21 bit unicode charac ters? jarkko.hietaniemi@nokia.com (Tue Apr 17 2001 - 10:29:06 EDT)
• RE: How will software source code represent 21 bit unicode charac ters? Yves Arrouye (Tue Apr 17 2001 - 11:29:58 EDT)
• Re: benefits of unicode Michael Everson (Tue Apr 17 2001 - 11:33:55 EDT)
• Re: How will software source code represent 21 bit unicode characters? Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk (Tue Apr 17 2001 - 13:08:47 EDT)
• RE: How will software source code represent 21 bit unicode charac ters? Carl W. Brown (Tue Apr 17 2001 - 13:40:55 EDT)
• Re: benefits of unicode Edward Cherlin (Tue Apr 17 2001 - 14:34:02 EDT)
• RE: How will software source code represent 21 bit unicode charac ters? Yves Arrouye (Tue Apr 17 2001 - 14:56:07 EDT)
• RE: benefits of unicode Ayers, Mike (Tue Apr 17 2001 - 15:04:57 EDT)
• Re: benefits of unicode Peter_Constable@sil.org (Tue Apr 17 2001 - 15:04:26 EDT)
• Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) Peter_Constable@sil.org (Tue Apr 17 2001 - 15:41:08 EDT)
• Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) Peter_Constable@sil.org (Tue Apr 17 2001 - 15:45:14 EDT)
• Re: benefits of unicode David Starner (Tue Apr 17 2001 - 16:45:36 EDT)
• Re: 21 bit unicode and older computing equipment Jim DeLaHunt (Tue Apr 17 2001 - 17:28:51 EDT)
• Re: benefits of unicode Michael \(michka\) Kaplan (Tue Apr 17 2001 - 18:10:20 EDT)
• Re: Characters not Glyphs (Was Re: Reviewing IETF documents) Harald Tveit Alvestrand (Tue Apr 17 2001 - 05:18:47 EDT)
• RE: benefits of unicode Edward Cherlin (Tue Apr 17 2001 - 21:20:58 EDT)
• RE: How will software source code represent 21 bit unicode characters? Martin Duerst (Tue Apr 17 2001 - 12:14:25 EDT)
• Re: Characters not Glyphs (Was Re: Reviewing IETF documents) John Hudson (Tue Apr 17 2001 - 22:28:00 EDT)
• Re: benefits of unicode Michael Everson (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 04:44:42 EDT)
• Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) James Kass (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 05:07:24 EDT)
• Re: (OT) Pyramid Blocks (was Latin w/ diacritics) James Kass (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 06:37:40 EDT)
• RE: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) Marco Cimarosti (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 06:49:23 EDT)
• Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) Michael Everson (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 06:50:20 EDT)
• Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) James Kass (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 08:18:15 EDT)
• Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) James Kass (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 08:28:27 EDT)
• Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) Michael \(michka\) Kaplan (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 09:16:06 EDT)
• Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) Michael Everson (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 09:28:24 EDT)
• Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) Peter_Constable@sil.org (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 09:40:49 EDT)
• RE: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) Marco Cimarosti (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 10:10:31 EDT)
• Hacking the pyramids (Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits o f unicode)) Marco Cimarosti (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 11:03:24 EDT)
• Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) James Kass (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 11:30:56 EDT)
• RE: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) Peter_Constable@sil.org (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 11:28:52 EDT)
• Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) Peter_Constable@sil.org (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 11:35:15 EDT)
• Re: Putting unicode@unicode.org first (in the To:field) Gaute B Strokkenes (Tue Apr 17 2001 - 23:26:46 EDT)
• 21-bit unicode 11digitboy@bolt.com (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 11:48:12 EDT)
• RE: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) Peter_Constable@sil.org (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 11:48:23 EDT)
• Re: Hacking the pyramids (Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits o f unicode)) Peter_Constable@sil.org (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 11:56:25 EDT)
• Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) Peter_Constable@sil.org (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 12:06:27 EDT)
• Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) Michael Everson (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 12:25:23 EDT)
• Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) Michael \(michka\) Kaplan (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 12:52:44 EDT)
• RE: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) Marco Cimarosti (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 12:59:23 EDT)
• Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) James Kass (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 13:01:48 EDT)
• RE: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) John Hudson (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 13:20:15 EDT)
• Re: 21-bit unicode Peter_Constable@sil.org (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 13:20:17 EDT)
• Re: Hacking the pyramids (Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits o f unicode)) John Hudson (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 13:26:43 EDT)
• RE: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) Carl W. Brown (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 14:35:17 EDT)
• RE: 21-bit unicode Ayers, Mike (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 14:43:07 EDT)
• Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) James Kass (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 14:51:03 EDT)
• Hacking Unicode on DOS (was: RE: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode)) Kenneth Whistler (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 14:48:55 EDT)
• RE: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) Marco Cimarosti (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 15:03:42 EDT)
• RE: benefits of unicode Ayers, Mike (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 15:09:30 EDT)
• Re: benefits of unicode Edward Cherlin (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 15:35:31 EDT)
• RE: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) Kenneth Whistler (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 15:49:06 EDT)
• RE: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) Edward Cherlin (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 16:17:19 EDT)
• Pahawh Hmong (was re: Latin w/diacritics) James Kass (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 17:30:25 EDT)
• RE: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) Jungshik Shin (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 21:56:13 EDT)
• Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) Michael \(michka\) Kaplan (Wed Apr 18 2001 - 23:18:05 EDT)
• Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) Jungshik Shin (Thu Apr 19 2001 - 00:21:48 EDT)
• Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) Michael \(michka\) Kaplan (Thu Apr 19 2001 - 01:23:52 EDT)
• Re: benefits of unicode David Starner (Thu Apr 19 2001 - 01:24:59 EDT)
• Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) Jungshik Shin (Thu Apr 19 2001 - 01:41:49 EDT)
• Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) Michael \(michka\) Kaplan (Thu Apr 19 2001 - 02:44:30 EDT)
• RE: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) Marco Cimarosti (Thu Apr 19 2001 - 05:36:10 EDT)
• Byte Order Marks Tomas McGuinness (Thu Apr 19 2001 - 08:58:09 EDT)
• Re: Byte Order Marks Markus Scherer (Thu Apr 19 2001 - 13:12:16 EDT)
• OT Porting to older OSes was RE: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) Carl W. Brown (Thu Apr 19 2001 - 14:09:19 EDT)
• Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) Juliusz Chroboczek (Thu Apr 19 2001 - 15:59:16 EDT)
• RE: Byte Order Marks Yves Arrouye (Thu Apr 19 2001 - 16:52:25 EDT)
• Fwd: Re: Byte Order Marks Asmus Freytag (Thu Apr 19 2001 - 17:00:33 EDT)
• Unicode motivation/horror stories (was RE: benefits of unicode) Edward Cherlin (Thu Apr 19 2001 - 19:23:15 EDT)
• RE: benefits of unicode Ayers, Mike (Thu Apr 19 2001 - 19:37:35 EDT)
• one question Emil Her¹ak (Thu Apr 19 2001 - 20:59:00 EDT)
• Re: benefits of unicode David Starner (Thu Apr 19 2001 - 21:10:04 EDT)
• Re: Byte Order Marks Markus Scherer (Thu Apr 19 2001 - 21:24:47 EDT)
• Re: Byte Order Marks David Starner (Thu Apr 19 2001 - 22:48:05 EDT)
• [OT]Gutenberg (was Re: Hacking the pyramids (Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode))) Edward Cherlin (Fri Apr 20 2001 - 00:25:11 EDT)
• Re: one question John Hudson (Fri Apr 20 2001 - 00:43:12 EDT)
• Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode) William Overington (Fri Apr 20 2001 - 03:13:57 EDT)
• XML encoding problem? Ollikainen, Jari (Fri Apr 20 2001 - 04:07:47 EDT)
• RE: Byte Order Marks Yves Arrouye (Fri Apr 20 2001 - 04:12:50 EDT)
• RE: Byte Order Marks Yves Arrouye (Fri Apr 20 2001 - 04:15:24 EDT)
• RE: [OT]Gutenberg (was Re: Hacking the pyramids (Re: Latin w/ dia critics (was Re: benefits of unicode))) Giles, Suzanne (Fri Apr 20 2001 - 05:04:59 EDT)
• Egyptian Hieroglyphics (was Re: Latin w/ diacritics) James Kass (Fri Apr 20 2001 - 06:39:51 EDT)
• Re: XML encoding problem? Michael \(michka\) Kaplan (Fri Apr 20 2001 - 08:17:17 EDT)
• Re: one question Peter_Constable@sil.org (Fri Apr 20 2001 - 09:09:08 EDT)
• Re: Egyptian Hieroglyphics Dean A. Snyder (Fri Apr 20 2001 - 10:20:15 EDT)
• Re: one question N.R.Liwal (Fri Apr 20 2001 - 10:57:50 EDT)
• ASCII adequacy (was: RE: benefits of unicode) Ayers, Mike (Fri Apr 20 2001 - 12:31:10 EDT)
• Re: [OT]Gutenberg (was Re: Hacking the pyramids (Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of unicode))) J M Sykes (Fri Apr 20 2001 - 05:45:21 EDT)
• Re: Egyptian Hieroglyphics James Kass (Fri Apr 20 2001 - 12:59:15 EDT)
• Re: Egyptian Hieroglyphics Michael Everson (Fri Apr 20 2001 - 13:34:02 EDT)
• Re: Byte Order Marks Markus Scherer (Fri Apr 20 2001 - 13:40:09 EDT)
• Re: ASCII adequacy (was: RE: benefits of unicode) David Starner (Fri Apr 20 2001 - 14:17:00 EDT)
• RE: ASCII adequacy (was: RE: benefits of unicode) jarkko.hietaniemi@nokia.com (Fri Apr 20 2001 - 15:02:17 EDT)
• Re: Egyptian Hieroglyphics Asmus Freytag (Fri Apr 20 2001 - 15:23:00 EDT)
• Re: ASCII adequacy (was: RE: benefits of unicode) David Starner (Fri Apr 20 2001 - 15:24:56 EDT)
• Re: Egyptian Hieroglyphics Dean A. Snyder (Fri Apr 20 2001 - 15:30:31 EDT)
• RE: ASCII adequacy (was: RE: benefits of unicode) jarkko.hietaniemi@nokia.com (Fri Apr 20 2001 - 15:43:02 EDT)
• Re: Egyptian Hieroglyphics Dean A. Snyder (Fri Apr 20 2001 - 15:52:49 EDT)
• Re: Egyptian Hieroglyphics Rick McGowan (Fri Apr 20 2001 - 15:58:10 EDT)
• Re: ASCII adequacy (was: RE: benefits of unicode) David Starner (Fri Apr 20 2001 - 16:42:12 EDT)
• RE: ASCII adequacy (was: RE: benefits of unicode) jarkko.hietaniemi@nokia.com (Fri Apr 20 2001 - 16:50:42 EDT)
• Re: Egyptian Hieroglyphics James Kass (Fri Apr 20 2001 - 16:58:51 EDT)
• Re: Egyptian Hieroglyphics Kenneth Whistler (Fri Apr 20 2001 - 17:48:04 EDT)
• ICU charset mapping table collection online Markus Scherer (Fri Apr 20 2001 - 18:03:05 EDT)
• RE: ASCII adequacy (was: RE: benefits of unicode) Asmus Freytag (Fri Apr 20 2001 - 18:19:32 EDT)
• Re: Unicode editing Jonathan Rosenne (Sun Apr 22 2001 - 15:34:48 EDT)
• On the possibility of guidance code points for the Private Use Area William Overington (Mon Apr 23 2001 - 09:45:21 EDT)
• Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for the Private Use Area Michael Everson (Mon Apr 23 2001 - 11:12:03 EDT)
• Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for the Private Use Area DougEwell2@cs.com (Mon Apr 23 2001 - 11:30:26 EDT)
• Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for the Private Use Area Michael Everson (Mon Apr 23 2001 - 12:51:46 EDT)
• RE: How will software source code represent 21 bit unicode charac ters? Mike Brown (Mon Apr 23 2001 - 13:28:51 EDT)
• Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for the PrivateUse Area Rick McGowan (Mon Apr 23 2001 - 14:10:00 EDT)
• Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for the Private Use Area Kenneth Whistler (Mon Apr 23 2001 - 15:15:01 EDT)
• Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for the Private Use Area Peter_Constable@sil.org (Mon Apr 23 2001 - 15:31:58 EDT)
• Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for the PrivateUse Area Peter_Constable@sil.org (Mon Apr 23 2001 - 16:15:08 EDT)
• Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for the Private Use Area Eric Muller (Mon Apr 23 2001 - 18:10:04 EDT)
• RE: ASCII adequacy (was: RE: benefits of unicode) Edward Cherlin (Mon Apr 23 2001 - 18:26:43 EDT)
• Re: On the possibility of guidance... Sarasvati (Mon Apr 23 2001 - 17:43:46 EDT)
• Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for the Private Use Area Timothy Partridge (Mon Apr 23 2001 - 18:50:00 EDT)
• Re: On the possibility of guidance... Eric Muller (Mon Apr 23 2001 - 19:08:46 EDT)
• Re: On the possibility of guidance... Asmus Freytag (Mon Apr 23 2001 - 23:42:44 EDT)
• RE: On the possibility of guidance code points for the Private Us e Area Marco Cimarosti (Tue Apr 24 2001 - 05:18:43 EDT)
• Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for the Private Use Area Peter_Constable@sil.org (Tue Apr 24 2001 - 07:28:29 EDT)
• Re: On the possibility of guidance... William Overington (Tue Apr 24 2001 - 07:54:07 EDT)
• Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for the Private Use Area William Overington (Tue Apr 24 2001 - 07:54:16 EDT)
• Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for the Private Use Area William Overington (Tue Apr 24 2001 - 07:54:23 EDT)
• Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for the Private Use Area William Overington (Tue Apr 24 2001 - 07:54:27 EDT)
• RE: On the possibility of guidance code points for the Private Us e Area Marco Cimarosti (Tue Apr 24 2001 - 08:22:30 EDT)
• Re: Egyptian Hieroglyphics Michael Everson (Tue Apr 24 2001 - 09:47:20 EDT)
• Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for the Private Use Area DougEwell2@cs.com (Tue Apr 24 2001 - 11:53:03 EDT)
• Re: On the possibility of guidance... DougEwell2@cs.com (Tue Apr 24 2001 - 11:53:17 EDT)
• RE: On the possibility of guidance... Marco Cimarosti (Tue Apr 24 2001 - 13:23:41 EDT)
• Re: On the possibility of guidance... Michael \(michka\) Kaplan (Tue Apr 24 2001 - 14:18:40 EDT)
• Re: On the possibility of guidance... Michael Everson (Tue Apr 24 2001 - 15:20:41 EDT)
• Re: Egyptian Hieroglyphics Kenneth Whistler (Tue Apr 24 2001 - 15:36:28 EDT)
• Re: Egyptian Hieroglyphics Michael Everson (Tue Apr 24 2001 - 15:50:52 EDT)
• RE: On the possibility of guidance code points for the Private Us e Area Ayers, Mike (Tue Apr 24 2001 - 16:27:57 EDT)
• Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for the Private Use Area Eric Muller (Tue Apr 24 2001 - 16:57:59 EDT)
• three characters? Roozbeh Pournader (Tue Apr 24 2001 - 17:18:23 EDT)
• Re: three characters? Rick McGowan (Tue Apr 24 2001 - 17:27:08 EDT)
• Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for the Private Use Area Peter_Constable@sil.org (Tue Apr 24 2001 - 17:42:34 EDT)
• Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for the Private Use Area Peter_Constable@sil.org (Tue Apr 24 2001 - 17:30:40 EDT)
• Re: On the possibility of guidance... Peter_Constable@sil.org (Tue Apr 24 2001 - 18:17:43 EDT)
• Re: On the possibility of guidance... Peter_Constable@sil.org (Tue Apr 24 2001 - 17:49:05 EDT)
• Re: three characters? James Kass (Tue Apr 24 2001 - 20:29:21 EDT)
• Re: three characters? John Cowan (Tue Apr 24 2001 - 20:52:41 EDT)
• Decimal Unicodepoints 11digitboy@bolt.com (Wed Apr 25 2001 - 00:04:00 EDT)
• Internationalization Problem Rajesh.Bhatia@baypackets.com (Wed Apr 25 2001 - 11:16:11 EDT)
• Re: three characters? Roozbeh Pournader (Wed Apr 25 2001 - 00:57:27 EDT)
• Re: three characters? Roozbeh Pournader (Wed Apr 25 2001 - 01:02:41 EDT)
• Re: Decimal Unicodepoints David Starner (Wed Apr 25 2001 - 02:09:54 EDT)
• Re: three characters? James Kass (Wed Apr 25 2001 - 02:59:56 EDT)
• Re: three characters? N.R.Liwal (Wed Apr 25 2001 - 02:00:47 EDT)
• Tags and the Private Use Area (derives from On the possibility of guidance code points for the Private Use Area) William Overington (Wed Apr 25 2001 - 06:45:12 EDT)
• Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for the Private Use Area William Overington (Wed Apr 25 2001 - 06:40:24 EDT)
• RE: On the possibility of guidance code points for the Private Us e Area Ayers, Mike (Wed Apr 25 2001 - 11:48:30 EDT)
• Re: Tags and the Private Use Area Rick McGowan (Wed Apr 25 2001 - 12:16:43 EDT)
• Re: Decimal Unicodepoints Elliotte Rusty Harold (Wed Apr 25 2001 - 11:37:00 EDT)
• FW: converting unicode (UTF-8) on a Word document Magda Danish (Unicode) (Wed Apr 25 2001 - 13:36:36 EDT)
• Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for the Private Use Area Wm Seán Glen (Wed Apr 25 2001 - 13:59:09 EDT)
• Re: converting unicode (UTF-8) on a Word document Jeff Guevin (Wed Apr 25 2001 - 15:00:06 EDT)
• Re: Tags and the Private Use Area David Starner (Wed Apr 25 2001 - 15:43:59 EDT)
• Re: Tags and the Private Use Area Rick McGowan (Wed Apr 25 2001 - 17:34:53 EDT)
• Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for the Private Use Area Peter_Constable@sil.org (Wed Apr 25 2001 - 18:52:45 EDT)
• Re: Tags and the Private Use Area Eric Muller (Wed Apr 25 2001 - 19:52:14 EDT)
• Re: Tags and the Private Use Area Rick McGowan (Wed Apr 25 2001 - 20:07:00 EDT)
• Re: Tags and the Private Use Area John Cowan (Wed Apr 25 2001 - 20:14:05 EDT)
• Unicode in a URL Paul Deuter (Wed Apr 25 2001 - 22:41:07 EDT)
• RE: Decimal Unicodepoints Marco Cimarosti (Thu Apr 26 2001 - 04:27:44 EDT)
• Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for the Private Use Area William Overington (Thu Apr 26 2001 - 06:14:21 EDT)
• Re: three characters? James Kass (Thu Apr 26 2001 - 06:46:10 EDT)
• RE: On the possibility of guidance... Marco Cimarosti (Thu Apr 26 2001 - 07:52:32 EDT)
• RE: On the possibility of guidance... Roozbeh Pournader (Thu Apr 26 2001 - 09:59:32 EDT)
• RE: On the possibility of guidance... Marco Cimarosti (Thu Apr 26 2001 - 10:11:16 EDT)
• RE: On the possibility of guidance... Roozbeh Pournader (Thu Apr 26 2001 - 10:18:31 EDT)
• RE: On the possibility of guidance... Marco Cimarosti (Thu Apr 26 2001 - 10:31:36 EDT)
• RE: On the possibility of guidance... Roozbeh Pournader (Thu Apr 26 2001 - 11:01:22 EDT)
• Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for the Private Use Area William Overington (Thu Apr 26 2001 - 10:39:25 EDT)
• Re: Tags and the Private Use Area William Overington (Thu Apr 26 2001 - 11:47:03 EDT)
• RE: Unicode in a URL Paul Deuter (Thu Apr 26 2001 - 12:16:42 EDT)
• RE: How will software source code represent 21 bit unicode charac ters? addison@inter-locale.com (Thu Apr 26 2001 - 12:23:25 EDT)
• RE: Unicode editing Marco Cimarosti (Thu Apr 26 2001 - 12:54:30 EDT)
• RE: Unicode editing Jonathan Rosenne (Thu Apr 26 2001 - 13:47:59 EDT)
• Re: Unicode in a URL David Starner (Thu Apr 26 2001 - 14:14:41 EDT)
• Re: Unicode in a URL Markus Scherer (Thu Apr 26 2001 - 14:28:33 EDT)
• Re: Tags and the Private Use Area Michael \(michka\) Kaplan (Thu Apr 26 2001 - 15:23:36 EDT)
• RE: Unicode in a URL Paul Deuter (Thu Apr 26 2001 - 18:02:24 EDT)
• Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for the Private Use Area Peter_Constable@sil.org (Thu Apr 26 2001 - 12:25:24 EDT)
• Re: Tags and the Private Use Area Peter_Constable@sil.org (Thu Apr 26 2001 - 18:45:44 EDT)
• Pollard list set up John H. Jenkins (Thu Apr 26 2001 - 09:28:40 EDT)
• RE: Unicode in a URL Carl W. Brown (Thu Apr 26 2001 - 20:31:07 EDT)
• Re: Tags and the Private Use Area Kenneth Whistler (Thu Apr 26 2001 - 20:40:22 EDT)
• RE: Unicode in a URL Mike Brown (Thu Apr 26 2001 - 21:09:48 EDT)
• Re: Unicode in a URL Martin Duerst (Thu Apr 26 2001 - 21:33:00 EDT)
• RE: Unicode in a URL Martin Duerst (Thu Apr 26 2001 - 22:00:45 EDT)
• Re: Unicode in a URL Martin Duerst (Thu Apr 26 2001 - 21:44:48 EDT)
• RE: Unicode in a URL Martin Duerst (Thu Apr 26 2001 - 23:05:27 EDT)
• RE: Unicode editing Marco Cimarosti (Fri Apr 27 2001 - 05:13:53 EDT)
• Using hex numbers cosidered a geek attitude (was; Re: Decimal Unicodepoints) Karl Pentzlin (Fri Apr 27 2001 - 07:04:26 EDT)
• RE: Using hex numbers cosidered a geek attitude (was; Re: Decimal Unicodepoints) Marco Cimarosti (Fri Apr 27 2001 - 09:01:59 EDT)
• Re: On the possibility of guidance code points for the Private Use Area Bob_Hallissy@sil.org (Fri Apr 27 2001 - 11:20:38 EDT)
• Re: Using hex numbers considered a geek attitude DougEwell2@cs.com (Fri Apr 27 2001 - 11:43:54 EDT)
• Re: Using hex numbers cosidered a geek attitude (was; Re: Decimal Unicodepoints) David Starner (Fri Apr 27 2001 - 12:32:26 EDT)
• RE: Unicode in a URL addison@inter-locale.com (Fri Apr 27 2001 - 12:38:14 EDT)
• Re: three characters? Bob_Hallissy@sil.org (Fri Apr 27 2001 - 12:09:42 EDT)
• Invalid char display (was: Using hex numbers considered a geek attitude) Carl W. Brown (Fri Apr 27 2001 - 13:40:41 EDT)
• RE: Unicode in a URL Mike Brown (Fri Apr 27 2001 - 14:05:06 EDT)
• Re: Invalid char display (was: Using hex numbers considered a geek attitude) Frank da Cruz (Fri Apr 27 2001 - 14:56:43 EDT)
• Re: three characters? Roozbeh Pournader (Fri Apr 27 2001 - 14:57:26 EDT)
• Re: Using hex numbers cosidered a geek attitude (was; Re: Decimal Unicodepoints) Kenneth Whistler (Fri Apr 27 2001 - 15:12:35 EDT)
• Re: Invalid char display (was: Using hex numbers considered a geek attitude) Misha Wolf (Fri Apr 27 2001 - 21:48:43 EDT)
• Re: Using hex numbers cosidered a geek attitude (was; Re: Decimal Unicodepoints) Thomas Chan (Fri Apr 27 2001 - 22:55:43 EDT)
• Re: Tags and the Private Use Area William Overington (Sat Apr 28 2001 - 10:44:51 EDT)
• Provenance of the Unicode Standard and of statements (derives from Re: Tags and the Private Use Area) William Overington (Sat Apr 28 2001 - 10:50:03 EDT)
• RE: Invalid char display (was: Using hex numbers considered a geek attitude) Carl W. Brown (Sat Apr 28 2001 - 12:12:56 EDT)
• IDS question Thomas Chan (Sat Apr 28 2001 - 12:13:51 EDT)
• Re: Provenance of the Unicode Standard and of statements Rick McGowan (Sat Apr 28 2001 - 14:26:26 EDT)
• Cutting to the chase (was Re: Tags and the Private Use Area) Michael \(michka\) Kaplan (Sat Apr 28 2001 - 16:19:45 EDT)
• Re: Provenance of the Unicode Standard and of statements Wm Seán Glen (Sat Apr 28 2001 - 19:35:54 EDT)
• Re: Tags and the Private Use Area James Kass (Sat Apr 28 2001 - 20:44:23 EDT)
• Re: Tags and the Private Use Area John Cowan (Sat Apr 28 2001 - 23:19:27 EDT)
• Re: Tags and the Private Use Area Asmus Freytag (Sun Apr 29 2001 - 02:38:30 EDT)
• Re: Tags and the Private Use Area Asmus Freytag (Sun Apr 29 2001 - 04:09:45 EDT)
• Re: Tags and the Private Use Area David Starner (Sun Apr 29 2001 - 04:14:23 EDT)
• Re: Tags and the Private Use Area James Kass (Sun Apr 29 2001 - 04:26:18 EDT)
• Re: Tags and the Private Use Area David Starner (Sun Apr 29 2001 - 05:46:25 EDT)
• Re: Tags and the Private Use Area David Starner (Sun Apr 29 2001 - 05:49:19 EDT)
• Re: Tags and the Private Use Area James Kass (Sun Apr 29 2001 - 08:39:33 EDT)
• RE: On the possibility of guidance... Michael Everson (Sun Apr 29 2001 - 18:05:19 EDT)
• FW: Vietnam IT Forum @ Stanford Misha Wolf (Sun Apr 29 2001 - 21:43:39 EDT)
• FW: IDS question Ayers, Mike (Mon Apr 30 2001 - 13:51:02 EDT)
• Re: IDS question Kenneth Whistler (Mon Apr 30 2001 - 14:33:38 EDT)
• Re: FW: IDS question Thomas Chan (Mon Apr 30 2001 - 14:54:36 EDT)
• Re: Provenance of the Unicode Standard and of statements (derives from Re: Tags and the Private Use Area) Kenneth Whistler (Mon Apr 30 2001 - 15:46:17 EDT)
• UTF-8 on this list Ayers, Mike (Mon Apr 30 2001 - 16:21:27 EDT)
• PC code pages and national character sets Teruhiko Kurosaka (Mon Apr 30 2001 - 17:38:47 EDT)
• Re: PC code pages and national character sets TOYOSHIMA,Masayuki (Mon Apr 30 2001 - 18:49:27 EDT)
• Terminology questions 11digitboy@bolt.com (Mon Apr 30 2001 - 19:25:47 EDT)
• RE: PC code pages and national character sets Mike Brown (Mon Apr 30 2001 - 20:31:35 EDT)
• Re: Terminology questions Kenneth Whistler (Mon Apr 30 2001 - 20:49:01 EDT)
• Re: PC code pages and national character sets David Starner (Mon Apr 30 2001 - 20:54:11 EDT)
• Re: Terminology questions Kenneth Whistler (Mon Apr 30 2001 - 21:30:09 EDT)
• Re: PC code pages and national character sets Michael \(michka\) Kaplan (Mon Apr 30 2001 - 22:06:50 EDT)
• Re: PC code pages and national character sets David Starner (Mon Apr 30 2001 - 23:04:14 EDT)
• Re: UTF-8 on this list DougEwell2@cs.com (Mon Apr 30 2001 - 23:11:46 EDT)
• Re: PC code pages and national character sets Michael \(michka\) Kaplan (Mon Apr 30 2001 - 23:39:14 EDT)
• Re: Terminology questions James Kass (Tue May 01 2001 - 00:15:04 EDT)

Last message date: Mon Apr 30 2001 - 23:05:36 EDT
Archived on: Fri Jul 06 2001 - 00:17:16 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Jul 06 2001 - 00:17:16 EDT