On Tue, 5 Jun 2001, Mark Leisher wrote:
> http://www.hastingsresearch.com/net/04-unicode-limitations.shtml
Hmm, lots of ink spilled just to rehash a weak argument against Han
Unification.
Beneath the misinterpretations and typos, I do see hints of valid concerns
about yet-unencoded Han characters (e.g., neglect/bias of/against Taoism
and old texts--the sort of thing he works with), which would have made a
better argument.
It wouldn't hurt for him to have newer and more advanced references, too.
Thomas Chan
tc31@cornell.edu
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Jul 06 2001 - 00:17:18 EDT