>The point is that encodings currently used for French have none of these.
Well, then, just do what the French do: don't use any of them, even though
you may be tempted to use some.
>The ideal for me, rather than adding the missing "e" and "i", would be to
>delete the existing "a" and "o".
So, at least in principle, you're open to the suggestion I offer above.
>Then, I preferred not to venture on the ground languages that I don't know
>well enough. Moreover, talking about a single language, I hoped to avoid
the
>"my-language-too" effect.
So I'm inclined to propose my ideas for phonetics strictly for the purpose
of phonetics.
- Peter
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Constable
Non-Roman Script Initiative, SIL International
7500 W. Camp Wisdom Rd., Dallas, TX 75236, USA
Tel: +1 972 708 7485
E-mail: <peter_constable@sil.org>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Jul 06 2001 - 00:17:18 EDT