Yes. Very Zen. I like it.
I am now on [0] bloody Marikos.
Reminds me of .... YOU need at least [6] drinks to hear this.
I will Rot 13 it.
Va na Rqqvr Zhecul zbivr:
Guvf jbzna snegrq erny ybhq.
Fbzrbar orengrq ure.
Fur fnvq: "V jnfa'g gnyxvat gb lbh... abg hayrff lbhe anzr vf" (sneg)
V jbhyq hfr snegf sbe npebalzf.
$B!!!!$i$s$^(B $B!z$8$e$&$$$C$A$c$s!z(B
$B!!!_$"$+$M(B
$B!<!<!<!<!<(B PTKA IZGT F SFNNGYGB ZRMSFTB WM
$B!!$"$^$s$1(B NFEGT FM MGYWPRMKA FM F SFNNGYGB IWOG
$B$M$1$"$:!!(B IWKK QGT FT IPQGT ZFXG GHRFK YWJZNM.
$B$i$s$^!!!!(B
$B!<!<!<!<!<(B
$B$$$$$J$:$1(B
--- Original Message ---
$B:9=P?M(B: Curtis Clark <jcclark@csupomona.edu>;
$B08@h(B: unicode@unicode.org;
Cc:
$BF|;~(B: 01/06/26 0:36
$B7oL>(B: Re: Playing with Unicode (was: Re: UTF-17)
>At 10:13 AM 6/25/01, Otto Stolz wrote:
>>Yet, I acknowledge the need to clearly mark humorous UTF propositions
>>for the unsuspicious. Hence, I'd like to suggest to enclose their
>>respective acronyms between \u202B and \u202C. This would be enough
>>hinting on the skewed nature of such suggestions while still indicating
>>their acronymic nature.
>
>Don't you think it would be better to use a stateless notation? I suggest
>using Plane 14 characters for the acronyms.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Jul 06 2001 - 00:17:19 EDT