From: "Carl W. Brown" <cbrown@xnetinc.com>
> I had presumed that he was able to get Unicode support on NT but not 95.
I
> did something like this for a VB 3.0 application by writing controls to
> extend the language.
Indeed, you can get Unicode support on NT -- but that is *real* Unicode
support. The only true difference between MSLU
http://www.microsoft.com/globaldev/Articles/mslu_announce.asp
and that article from Avery Bishop (all on one line for the link!):
http://www.microsoft.com/msj/0499/multilangUnicode/multilangunicode.htm
is that the article describes a framework which then requires you to go do
all the work.... whereas MSLU does all the work for you. :-)
MichKa
Michael Kaplan
Trigeminal Software, Inc.
http://www.trigeminal.com/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Aug 31 2001 - 20:22:43 EDT