Re: discontent about Indic scripts and Unicode

From: Rick McGowan (rick@unicode.org)
Date: Wed Sep 19 2001 - 12:22:08 EDT

Previous message: James E. Agenbroad: "RE: discontent about Indic scripts and Unicode"
Maybe in reply to: Hietaniemi Jarkko (NRC/Boston): "discontent about Indic scripts and Unicode"
Next in thread: James E. Agenbroad: "Re: discontent about Indic scripts and Unicode"
Reply: James E. Agenbroad: "Re: discontent about Indic scripts and Unicode"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> If ISCII is still being developed does this suggest that Unicode and its ISO
> equivalent move too slowly?

ISCII dates back to 1988 with a revision in 1990. It's not "still being
developed" -- as far as I know, it's a stable standard that is under
routine maintenance.

I wonder if anyone has yet corresponded with the people who put up the
almost unbelievable misconceptions on the two web pages mentioned
yesterday? At least a note could go to the site owners, I would think.

Rick

Previous message: James E. Agenbroad: "RE: discontent about Indic scripts and Unicode"
Maybe in reply to: Hietaniemi Jarkko (NRC/Boston): "discontent about Indic scripts and Unicode"
Next in thread: James E. Agenbroad: "Re: discontent about Indic scripts and Unicode"
Reply: James E. Agenbroad: "Re: discontent about Indic scripts and Unicode"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Wed Sep 19 2001 - 11:11:29 EDT